using another engine to analyse on lichess

@Alakaluf , Did you use Leela on your mobile phone?
It will be the speed and quality of Leela you are expected to see in browser.

As I said Alakuf, Komodo is a more positionnal engine. Leela is something else. Whatever we prefer, it would be nice to be able to choose our favorit engine to analyse our games.

I analyze my games with Komodo using the Arena GUI

I prefer Komodo because it is a more positionally based engine.

But as someone has already mentioned here this is probably splitting hairs as most engines will give you same analysis for lower rated players of which I am one.

It's human nature to be perpetually unsatisfied with things as they are. As soon as we get what we want, then like a child we want something else...Perhaps we should be satisfied with what we already have....a great and free website to play and analyze our chess games with...That's a lot to be grateful for...

@drmrboss No, never used Leela on the phone. But on my rather old Laptop without graphics card. I'm using dkappes condensed nets and am - aside of endgames - very content with them.

I'm interested: Why dou you think Leela in the browser would be much worse than Leela on the Laptop outside of the browser?
Wouldn't the same apply for Stockfish in and out of the browser?

Aside of this, like eg. Sateh and acercamp mentioned, there are other engines which they prefer for analysis which are not NN-based, like Komodo. Of course, Komodo is not free and not open source, but there are millions of free open source engines which I would like more than Stockfish, like Gull.

I really like Nibbler and Lc0.

I find using some of the Maia weights to be educational, too. If you are looking for human-likes moves, Lc0/Nibble/Maia is the best combination I have found.