I am currently working on a school project aimed at analyzing the trends/behavior of cheaters using the Lichess database. I was wondering if it is possible to find any records of cheaters that have already been banned from Lichess for fair play, or just the usernames of cheaters? I don't need a 100% complete database of every single cheater, the most I need is a sample of maybe a few hundred to a maximum thousand, though more is definitely helpful. To make it clear, this post is not intended to publicly shame players/cheaters. Any help or insight is much appreciated!
I am currently working on a school project aimed at analyzing the trends/behavior of cheaters using the Lichess database. I was wondering if it is possible to find any records of cheaters that have already been banned from Lichess for fair play, or just the usernames of cheaters? I don't need a 100% complete database of every single cheater, the most I need is a sample of maybe a few hundred to a maximum thousand, though more is definitely helpful. To make it clear, this post is not intended to publicly shame players/cheaters. Any help or insight is much appreciated!
Nope. You are unable to view a list of cheaters. Most of them are already closed.
Nope. You are unable to view a list of cheaters. Most of them are already closed.
delivering such an list would be violation of privacy so obviously no.
delivering such an list would be violation of privacy so obviously no.
Does a list of usernames that cannot be traced back to physical person constitute a breach of privacy? Doubtful.
Does a list of usernames that cannot be traced back to physical person constitute a breach of privacy? Doubtful.
It would constitute a breach of privacy, if only one account could be traced back to a physical person. Which is highly likely.
It would constitute a breach of privacy, if only one account could be traced back to a physical person. Which is highly likely.
source?
@nrrrd said in #6:
source?
My employer's mandatory training courses on data protection.
@nrrrd said in #6:
> source?
My employer's mandatory training courses on data protection.
@nrrrd said in #4:
Does a list of usernames that cannot be traced back to physical person constitute a breach of privacy? Doubtful.
Also cheating in an online game is not a crime! So nothing technically would be violated there IMHO!
@nrrrd said in #4:
> Does a list of usernames that cannot be traced back to physical person constitute a breach of privacy? Doubtful.
Also cheating in an online game is not a crime! So nothing technically would be violated there IMHO!
I think they should named and found and put in stocks , " how do you like this move" throws rotten tomatoes , "and this non computer aided move " lobs a smelly fish .
anyway
you'd need to do a bit of scraping "this player violated terms of service" in red under the name , so python the API and beautiful soup ,maybe? I'm not an expert .
I think they should named and found and put in stocks , " how do you like this move" throws rotten tomatoes , "and this non computer aided move " lobs a smelly fish .
anyway
you'd need to do a bit of scraping "this player violated terms of service" in red under the name , so python the API and beautiful soup ,maybe? I'm not an expert .
@SquareTableKnight said in #8:
Also cheating in an online game is not a crime! So nothing technically would be violated there IMHO!
Yes, but some people might threaten physical violence against a doxxed cheater, which they definitely do deserve.
*Don't! Sorry, I meant to write "don't," not "do." Just a little Freudian slip there.
@SquareTableKnight said in #8:
> Also cheating in an online game is not a crime! So nothing technically would be violated there IMHO!
Yes, but some people might threaten physical violence against a doxxed cheater, which they definitely do deserve.
*Don't! Sorry, I meant to write "don't," not "do." Just a little Freudian slip there.