@MyMovesAreBad said in #9:
> Professor Mound of sound,
>
> You have forgottens one think
>
> Chess become a interested game becauz human brain is low, stupite and not storage of information correct or good. Thus, chest may be solfed, but from horizon and perspectif of human cognition, it is not solfed.
>
> Now of course you placate and entreaty your wisdom to human who is cognitionally trained and mentalistically developed by repetitions and habituation for integrate chessing excellence such as what you says : to memorialize superior openings & what not
>
> Thus, you is claims to have produced superior informations that make chessing result always in the draw among those higher chessing intellect
>
> But, problems is : i doesn't beleifes you.
>
> Becauz, human with trained and developed mental chessing excellence seek out and yield highest quality informations from 1) other similar high-capacity (in chessing exceollence) human and 2) robot, algorithemm and other machine learning process
>
> Thus, for you're clai m to be corrects, you must have prodducet more excellent knowledges than the above aforemtioned thinks
>
> Either
> 1) you are more higher caliber than highest tier of humans with chessing excellence. But for these to be a true knowledges, you would have tracks recorde to proofs it. But you haves none. Thus, (1) is not a true knowledges
> 2) you have developet more accurat robot informations than highest trained and highesst powerre human chessing robot, like robot of Googgel. But also similarly likewise, where are your proofs for this ?
>
> In concrusion, I do not beliefed you.
>
> Thus, it may be concluded that you are telling the ties on this liches .orge forums.
Bro...Ur joking With grammar, right?please tell me ur joking
> Professor Mound of sound,
>
> You have forgottens one think
>
> Chess become a interested game becauz human brain is low, stupite and not storage of information correct or good. Thus, chest may be solfed, but from horizon and perspectif of human cognition, it is not solfed.
>
> Now of course you placate and entreaty your wisdom to human who is cognitionally trained and mentalistically developed by repetitions and habituation for integrate chessing excellence such as what you says : to memorialize superior openings & what not
>
> Thus, you is claims to have produced superior informations that make chessing result always in the draw among those higher chessing intellect
>
> But, problems is : i doesn't beleifes you.
>
> Becauz, human with trained and developed mental chessing excellence seek out and yield highest quality informations from 1) other similar high-capacity (in chessing exceollence) human and 2) robot, algorithemm and other machine learning process
>
> Thus, for you're clai m to be corrects, you must have prodducet more excellent knowledges than the above aforemtioned thinks
>
> Either
> 1) you are more higher caliber than highest tier of humans with chessing excellence. But for these to be a true knowledges, you would have tracks recorde to proofs it. But you haves none. Thus, (1) is not a true knowledges
> 2) you have developet more accurat robot informations than highest trained and highesst powerre human chessing robot, like robot of Googgel. But also similarly likewise, where are your proofs for this ?
>
> In concrusion, I do not beliefed you.
>
> Thus, it may be concluded that you are telling the ties on this liches .orge forums.
Bro...Ur joking With grammar, right?please tell me ur joking
