Guys u are extremely rude with Thibault and the Lichess team here. When a guy use an engine smartly its really hard to spot, and it's a very hard call to do... This website is 100% free and they make an amazing job, also all the strong players that played with Thinkabit are very suspicious.
But as I said a person that uses an engine smartly are hard to catch and it's always going to be an hard call. Also with the level of play of Thinkabit, he would have to be 2700+ to play such a level, and Im even not sure Nakamura could cope with him
Guys u are extremely rude with Thibault and the Lichess team here. When a guy use an engine smartly its really hard to spot, and it's a very hard call to do... This website is 100% free and they make an amazing job, also all the strong players that played with Thinkabit are very suspicious.
But as I said a person that uses an engine smartly are hard to catch and it's always going to be an hard call. Also with the level of play of Thinkabit, he would have to be 2700+ to play such a level, and Im even not sure Nakamura could cope with him
very hard to create program for cheat
very hard to create program for cheat
he defeated stockfish more times than it defeated him.which engine did he use tht outclassed stockfish!!!
he defeated stockfish more times than it defeated him.which engine did he use tht outclassed stockfish!!!
This stockfish is not on an 100% level. Also if you have a better computer u would win in.
The real question is who can beat a strong computer in Bullet ? Even Kasparov lost to deep blue and it was in classical chess. in Bullet the computer would have an even much much bigger edge !!
This stockfish is not on an 100% level. Also if you have a better computer u would win in.
The real question is who can beat a strong computer in Bullet ? Even Kasparov lost to deep blue and it was in classical chess. in Bullet the computer would have an even much much bigger edge !!
Like pulling out long weeds i think a good list of other engine suspects starts with those who were beating thinkabit on bullet - and not just on time.
Like pulling out long weeds i think a good list of other engine suspects starts with those who were beating thinkabit on bullet - and not just on time.
^ Already been done.
I think people are focusing way too much on it. Though that's the idea of having a forum, I think thinkabit has been getting way too much attention. It was interesting few hours ago. The person has closed their account. If he/she was a cheater, he's gone. If he wasn't, and all of the people accusing him are wrong, he's still gone. Ergo, the "problem" is solved, the monster has been slain, the dame is rescued, and all that.
Get over it. Geebus.
I think people are focusing way too much on it. Though that's the idea of having a forum, I think thinkabit has been getting way too much attention. It was interesting few hours ago. The person has closed their account. If he/she was a cheater, he's gone. If he wasn't, and all of the people accusing him are wrong, he's still gone. Ergo, the "problem" is solved, the monster has been slain, the dame is rescued, and all that.
Get over it. Geebus.
Seems like everyone on their dog has an opinion on this subject.
-Yes, thinkabit has been marked as a cheater.
-No, no-one "knows" 100% in either direction. But we are confident enough to mark him as a cheater as there is enough supporting evidence.
-No, the mod team does not have to 'answer to you'. We're only a small group of individuals who donate their time to this site.
-No, it's not impossible to fool us, but we try our best.
-No, just because a cheater made some mistakes does not clear their name. And the opposite is also true.
Catching cheaters is not easy. About 5% of new accounts are marked as cheating on a daily basis, and it takes a considerable amount of work just to know which of the 600+ new accounts to investigate.
Now everyone, please go back to enjoying the great game of chess.
Seems like everyone on their dog has an opinion on this subject.
-Yes, thinkabit has been marked as a cheater.
-No, no-one "knows" 100% in either direction. But we are confident enough to mark him as a cheater as there is enough supporting evidence.
-No, the mod team does not have to 'answer to you'. We're only a small group of individuals who donate their time to this site.
-No, it's not impossible to fool us, but we try our best.
-No, just because a cheater made some mistakes does not clear their name. And the opposite is also true.
Catching cheaters is not easy. About 5% of new accounts are marked as cheating on a daily basis, and it takes a considerable amount of work just to know which of the 600+ new accounts to investigate.
Now everyone, please go back to enjoying the great game of chess.
Blitzstream-twitch: "and Im even not sure Nakamura could cope with him"
hmmm....really? ....I wonder.....
Blitzstream-twitch: "and Im even not sure Nakamura could cope with him"
hmmm....really? ....I wonder.....
thinkabit ,cheater or not, had been given us remarkable matches to spectate! Wish I could bookmark them all :(
RIP
thinkabit ,cheater or not, had been given us remarkable matches to spectate! Wish I could bookmark them all :(
RIP