Please stop accusing him, he most likely did not cheat. Firstly, if you look at the game itself, you'd see that it was very short, 20 moves long, with few opportunities to make an error. And many of the moves themselves do not come up on Stockfish's top 5 moves anyway, even with 2 mins to evaluate. (Yes OK OK he could have used Lc0 but that costs money)
Anyway why would you share a game if you cheated in it? It basically attracts attention, giving more people the chance to report it.
I really doubt he cheated. Please, people, consider your actions before you make a post accusing someone.
@Pi_Addict111 said in #11:
> Please stop accusing him, he most likely did not cheat. Firstly, if you look at the game itself, you'd see that it was very short, 20 moves long, with few opportunities to make an error. And many of the moves themselves do not come up on Stockfish's top 5 moves anyway, even with 2 mins to evaluate. (Yes OK OK he could have used Lc0 but that costs money)
> Anyway why would you share a game if you cheated in it? It basically attracts attention, giving more people the chance to report it.
> I really doubt he cheated. Please, people, consider your actions before you make a post accusing someone.
Yes that wouldn’t make sense
@JumpingHorsey
That's a little hypocritical, accusing someone of cheating, considering the current status of your own account. Also, this game was almost certainly clean, considering the easy tactics and the slightly messy conversion.
@Josho_Hart
Beginners can play good games once in a while, especially when their opponents don't play so well. Your comment seems to indicate a presumption of guilt just for playing well and having a low rating.
"I am sorry if I sound rude, or if I am accusing you of something you didn't do."
"I would rethink the choices that you made, though"
"I agree with #6 :-) "
You certainly don't seem very sorry...
@AustinL0926 said in #13:
> @JumpingHorsey
>
> That's a little hypocritical, accusing someone of cheating, considering the current status of your own account. Also, this game was almost certainly clean, considering the easy tactics and the slightly messy conversion.
>
> @Josho_Hart
>
> Beginners can play good games once in a while, especially when their opponents don't play so well. Your comment seems to indicate a presumption of guilt just for playing well and having a low rating.
>
> "I am sorry if I sound rude, or if I am accusing you of something you didn't do."
>
> "I would rethink the choices that you made, though"
>
> "I agree with #6 :-) "
>
> You certainly don't seem very sorry...
Agree
Aaaaaand of course @JumpingHorsey has violated the lichess terms of service too as well as accusing another player of cheating, which has been disproven. lol
#1 Nice!
In 1970 in an OTB game I was White in the position in your game after 7. Qf3+ and my opponent played 7... Kg8.
I suppose they thought their King was now safe. I mated in 3. I wasn't very good at the time, but had studied the Fried Liver Attack, and a forced checking sequence leading to mate was easy for me to visualize.
Guys white didn't cheat, rather black confused chess with anti-chess.
He simply allowed all the obvious one move tactics he could. And if there is a game where a 1200 can get 0-0-0, then it's that one.
OP was at +9 on move 9. The analysis engine is pretty generous when you have a big lead because almost everything is winning.
@LaserGuy said in #18:
> OP was at +9 on move 9. The analysis engine is pretty generous when you have a big lead because almost everything is winning.
Yes, get the opponent to make big mistakes in the first moves and voilá, you have 0-0-0-
Son mates ffaciles
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.