Lichess moderators are not so professional like chess.com moderators

well now the red mark shows for you

hi quarterquell
i played brewington hardaway and won on time
lol ur not duing that anytimesun butifudugl

There is a scholar's mate here i think

@QuarterQuell said in #10:

they seem to be more powerful then chess.com mods where as chess.com mods dont monitor chats at all
in comparison to lichess.

Doesn't seem like a bad thing to me.

Funny.
In case you want to appeal, the concerned account should do it at the appeal page.
And if you are talking about banning because of cheating, then it's not moderator work rather it is by cheat detection system of server.

I didn't report him though. I did report this one last night though:

@youssefMS_elshaer

after watching some lichessTV rapid, which I often do as I am going to bed. And most of it is clean, but not all of it.

@Deadban said in #24:

Doesn't seem like a bad thing to me.
It a good thing, they do there jobs well.

@OkeSan I see a couple of games where you resigned after just a few moves when you weren't losing, and that can be a reason for a mark and probably is.

However it's one of those that if you agree to stop doing it they can remove the mark (unlike engine use where the ban is irreversible).

So you want them to wear suits all the time and quote lines from James Bond?

@OkeSan said in #11:

Lichess mods are mean, like i ask a simple question during a simul and i get timed out! bruh.
Shh... it's class time. No talking is permitted.