Is this World Record ? (for the highest amount of puzzles solved in a single day) • page 2/4 • General Chess Discussion • lichess.org

OP's amount of puzzles solved is 22k. So yeah I think this is the new world record.
Oh please remind me to get new glasses

@AtomicChessSensei said in #10: > OP's amount of puzzles solved is 22k. So yeah I think this is the new world record. Oh please remind me to get new glasses

glbert

#12

maybe it is, maybe it isn't. i don't care. but sandbagging your rating to 1100 first was a dick move.

WCIS-Ethan-House

#13

ur soon gonna be blind...

Benji3359

#14

@TheBlunderingNerd said in #7:

Wow! That's an incredible feat. I wonder if they were at the "easiest" setting. I struggle to do the "normal" ones faster than 3-4 minutes on an average and even then I get a lot of them wrong!

I was solving mate in 1's to go faster, which makes the problems easier.
I played for about 15 hours, which means solving a puzzle every 2.5 seconds if I'm correct. So that definitely helped a lot.

@TheBlunderingNerd said in #7: > Wow! That's an incredible feat. I wonder if they were at the "easiest" setting. I struggle to do the "normal" ones faster than 3-4 minutes on an average and even then I get a lot of them wrong! I was solving mate in 1's to go faster, which makes the problems easier. I played for about 15 hours, which means solving a puzzle every 2.5 seconds if I'm correct. So that definitely helped a lot.

Benji3359

#15

@glbert said in #12:

but sandbagging your rating to 1100 first was a dick move.

I did this because of two things :
-First, my goal was to get as many puzzles as possible, no matter the settings. When practicing, I was solving twice as fast puzzles with a lower rating, so it was the obvious choice.
-The other problem was (because of the amount of puzzles solved) that I was getting the same puzzles from time to time, which doesn't count as a win on your profile when you solve it again. This is why I had to change my rating throughout the day.
See this post : https://lichess.org/forum/lichess-feedback/lichess-puzzles-distribution-by-rating
Lower rating = more puzzles, meaning I would get the same ones less often.

@glbert said in #12: > but sandbagging your rating to 1100 first was a dick move. I did this because of two things : -First, my goal was to get as many puzzles as possible, no matter the settings. When practicing, I was solving twice as fast puzzles with a lower rating, so it was the obvious choice. -The other problem was (because of the amount of puzzles solved) that I was getting the same puzzles from time to time, which doesn't count as a win on your profile when you solve it again. This is why I had to change my rating throughout the day. See this post : https://lichess.org/forum/lichess-feedback/lichess-puzzles-distribution-by-rating Lower rating = more puzzles, meaning I would get the same ones less often.

NM MrPushwood

#16

Yeah, I figured it was mate in 1s...and again, what was the point? (unless maybe it was hands rehab).

dooeyDecimal

#17

alright benji tomorrow we want 10000 mate in 2's

PolerioExpert edited

#18

I don't believe you can do 24h of 4sec a puzzle, and even if you did that it's nothing to be proud of to treat your body this way. Your body needs food, rest, sleep, ... I don't get how you can be proud of that, looks more like OCD forced you to reach 22222. Also what is the point of solving tactics that are for beginners? Solve real tactics that are made for your playing strength duh

NM ThunderClap

#19

You did this ??? Meaning sandbagging on Purpose ??????????????????????????? YOU said it @Benji3359 ... Bye Bye NO INTEGRITY people go to the bottom or get banned or have to go back around The Holland Tunnel again to get in hehe' in NY NY . Sandbagging on Ptrpose & admitting it Bye Bye loser

PolerioExpert

#20

@ThunderClap as a person flagged for sandbagging I feel slightly offended by this xD so go clap sth else than thunders