lichess.org
Donate

I cry foul, and hope against hope that powers that be fight the good fight to try and stop this

@Acerb8 said in #1:
> Strongly I feel that people should at the very least try and play chess without assistance, advanced chess should be played vs advanced chess players... all weekend I have been keyrushed and quite frankly I feel this keyrushing is done by assistance and not done by mono e mono....
>
> And if you are reading this and think the contrary, I value your opinion, but I recommend people play by themselves and stop annoying me with your assisted play.
>
> So what? You may ask, well, the so what is I refuse to play the ngn, and stop making me play yours, I am not happy, and if I complain I get the “oh if you feel then report “ I’m sorry, but there is not enough ngn time to investigate and prove a cheat is a cheat, so no, if you think it is okay to play chess assisted, then why even bother playing chess
>
> I think the future of people playing advanced chess is worthless and annoying, but, this is my opinion, however wrong I may be, I just would like to be assured that my opponent just wouldn’t do it to me, I am really easy to defeat, you really do not need to “look at the answers”
>
> Could someone please start an advanced chess league so these guys stop annoying me with this?
>
> I am not interested in spending hours pouring over your games trying to filter out when you play chess for yourself and when you decided to use assistance...
>
> Now you say “how do you really know?, “ and, “it’s impossible to say when one is using assistance “
> I say you, who use it know it’s you, and simply I would like to say stop it, it is frustrating to try and get away from provisional players as it is, I am tired of this yo yo experience, when I finally get to a level when my opponents are truly playing chess, I get keyrushed back down to playing provisional players, and let’s discuss this crap
> I play and lose 7 points, and when I win I only get 5 what is this? Can I win and get the same? But no, it as if I’m being ounsihed because I do not like the ngn’s recommendations as they are not really that good, but oh yeah, let’s believe this.... You do realize, that it is far too early to allow the ngn dictate your play...
>
> Look, 20 years ago the ngn’s, we all can say we’re poor chessplayers, oh, you say but they were stronger than me, duh, a beginner chessplayer is stronger than me, that is nothing, in twenty years everyone will know what I am saying Is true, todays ngn are not playing chess so stop pretending you are playing chess with using them...
>
> This is a general chess discussion, not a democratic thesis in human evolution...
> As if I cannot tell you cheats are cheating, you will find out all the time you are doing this has been wasted, but what do you care until twenty ywpears has gone by and say to yourself,” I shoulda” too late my friends now that you have wasted my time, I’ll be no longer alive when you finally realize you have wasted your time, what? Am I to believe the satisfaction in all this was to have annoyed me ha!
>
> All I’m saying is that if you think it is okay to use ngn’s against me, then start a league of ngn use, leave me out of it, and if you feel honor bound to show of your chess expertise and fool everyone, you are only cheating yourself from the richness and beauty of chess.
>
> And, if I am completely wrong and off base, and your no level chessplayers are actually super GM’s just waiting for the chance to show the world, then you wouldn be playing me in the first place... as if, play like this and I’d never see you otb at all, and, if I’m being trolled, stop it, I am not happy with being trolled, but it makes you happy to annoy me, and frustrate me laughing at me for having my hands bandaged because in my frustration I hit objects harder than my hands, in the sheer heights of my impotence then shame on you for getting an old man upset
>
> And if you think that I should just not play, lemmie tell you, I love chess win or lose, I am happy with wasting days on end devoted to it. But I will be unhappy when I’m not playing just you...
> Why would you think you need to use assistance when it comes to playing me, is the problem, I don’t like it, and I’m sure that the ngn does not like it... 8D, and another think why take out the use of emotes in tournies and forums? What is the issue, that makes emotes less desirable...
>
> Getting back to the point of this discussion,
>
> Play chess for yourself stop being a slave to the ngn, you will only win using it, what fun is that, when your wins were because of assistance, it’s okay to use every advantage in life at job at home, but at chess? Why? Who are you to impress? All you end up doing is frustrating me, and if that is your goal, then you done dit it, you can stop now...
> For all you “can’t wait to throw your snide two cents in people” go for it, I’m in the mood to continue this thread as long as LiChess lets me, snide people should be ashamed of yourselves for even thinking it’s fun to torment the elderly...
>
> But it is as it is, come out to play fools, come out to play...
>
> Now, for those with an honest opinion who would like to partake in a great conversation let’s partake, for, I am not sure the majority of online chessplayers even get the point of chess mono e mono, let’s try and get people to understand that the fact that you are willing to play chess at all is extraordinary, and your results at no time has any negative connotations, meaning that in order to play chess one must first play chess, and believe me chess players are not what your ngn use activities tell you they are, chess players are people too, we bleed when cut cry when hurt, have joy when happy, and eat when hungry
>
> You fools go on GM’s and IM’s and FM’s streams to “show them up” us chess viewers, those of us who like watching these masters play in the first place are not fooled, when you cheat them you only manage to have wasted their time when they could be playing a player who would hold that memory of a game with *gasp , (insert your favorite chessplayer here) for the rest of their lives, but no, you get to play them instead, and make a mockery of the whole event...
> All I am saying, is stop wasting everyone’s time with your ngn use nonsense you get nothing out of it, except an unprovable win vs a a chess Master,
>
> Do you even know why a chess master is a chess master, of course not, you merely want everyone to believe you are as good as them, will you make arraignments to get to a tourney, starve for a week just to afford it, blunder your entry game and feel badly for the rest of eternity just to do it all over again?
>
> Would you sacrifice family and friends to try and gain the title of master?
> Would you , would you?
>
> My friends it is all fun and games to be a chess legend at ten, to be grandmaster before you can produce young, but, the greater amount of those wanting to get good at chess, must suffer to fulfill their dreams, and you using an ngn to try and humiliate them in front of their audience gets old quickly....
>
> While a player takes days and days trying. To play a master, finally gets the chance, only because the vast majority of you fools want to portray a fraud, so, if you get in line to play a verified master, and use an ngn, shame on you for there is a guy who didn’t have their chance, this player would tell their friends they played a master of chess... and be happy, but no, you get in line and use an ngn so people “think” you are an unsung master yourself...
>
> And for those of you who can’t wait to say why so long a post, then have fun in life, you don’t have to waste your time to tell me, and spend your life being nasty to people, being trollish just because you can, the is no room for you, have fun making friends...
>
> And for those of you who feel I put you on the spot..., huh? How so, if you are not an ngn user you shouldn’t feel anything...
> Thanx for reading
> @acerb8
Hey @Acerb8 ,can you make the post shorter?I cannot read it(cuz I'm a lazy boy)
@Acerb8

i wrote what happened to me. If it was a synopsis of what you wrote, then i would have written that. I thought you might appreciate that others go through similar things. You do seem quite touchy, but since you put it all out there and some give you negative feedback, perhaps understandable.
@EmaciatedSpaniard said in #62:
> @Acerb8
>
> i wrote what happened to me. If it was a synopsis of what you wrote, then i would have written that. I thought you might appreciate that others go through similar things. You do seem quite touchy, but since you put it all out there and some give you negative feedback, perhaps understandable.

Great!!! I was hoping against hope that this is what you meant, and yes, I do appreciate it, for being alone with such experience is not easy, thank you,

@Acerb8
@Acerb8 there can be an explanation for our defeats without it being 100% our fault, when it happens to me I tell myself that I am paired with players who have the same level but who are in great shape and do their first game and hop we lose the first despite having played well, the second opponent also in great shape! , the third on the other hand no but he makes an opening the one we hate the most ,

the 4th was tight and we lose it for so little... then the frustration comes and we play badly. In these cases it's the fault of bad luck, but also our fault from an objective point of view (50/50) because despite everything we made mistakes and it allows us to analyze our games and progress, but defeats in a row unfortunately have to be accepted and to say it's bad luck as it can hopefully take away any frustration

and it's the truth that it's luck because it's not our fault if our opponent plays an opening that we don't like, it's not our fault if they are all in great shape, logic says that our score will come back because it is a balance, we must meet opponents less in shape than us, but this is not necessarily the case (and it's bad luck)

a person who wins the lottery, or a person who is love at first sight 7 times, the probability is tiny! the same can unfortunately apply to chess, a person can very often lose, because he was paired with the opponents at the wrong time, when we played a person of our level the probability says:have win more, 50/50 (win and lose),or lose more, one of the three can apply repeatedly over several days. I think it's because of that and no cheating

a person can believe that they don't like chess or doubt their level while everything depends on the opening for example, but of course there is when a part of our fault in all that, courage to Acerb8 and to others who happens to them the same thing

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.