Hey @street-magic while some of what I said was meant to be humorous tongue-in-cheek, most was quite serious and should of been explained better. So here goes....the pushup part was very serious if you want to get stronger generally at chess too. There is nothing like some discomfort to compel your mind to find shortcuts to eliminate pain.
Doing 500 puzzles a day will help you better than anything you can possibly do, in my experience of studying chess for 50 years. It's certainly not my idea, but I watched a YouTube video about the secrets of strong players and the GM suggested to become obsessed with doing tactics and it was best to do as much as possible, 500-1000 a day. He just kept saying that over and over. It still didn't sink in because....
When I heard him say this I didn't understand how that was possible because there wasn't something like Puzzle Storm or Puzzle Streak that came much later, so doing this many puzzles seemed impossible because many puzzles from books take quite a bit of time to solve.
However, he was talking about very simple puzzles and doing a ton of them because it is about pattern recognition and not the complexity of the puzzle. Times and methods have changed in the last 50 years, and I don't use books much any more, because there are apps and new technology to learn. Instead of doing 2 very difficult mate in two puzzles, it is much better to spend that time doing 100 simple puzzles because all tactics stem from skeletal ideas and there are only 5 families of tactics. Since January I solved over 40000 puzzles and noticed my biggest rating jump in my life.
The reason why Chess 960 is so good is because there was this famous GM called Bobby Fischer that invented it and called it New Chess and said it was the purest form of chess. I didn't believe him for the first 25 years or so because I didn't know anyone that played it or that it took about a minute to learn the rules.
I've beaten several strong masters in Chess 960.
Now, they didn't have a rating of 2200 plus at Chess 960 but they did at standard chess at either bullet, blitz, rapid or classic time controls. In fact I beat a friend of mine that is a NM for the first time in over 25 years because I didn't have to worry about his opening knowledge and instead I was superior tactically to him because of my muscle memory of doing about 300 tactics a day for months. It was an awesome boost of confidence that I will never get from playing him standard chess because of his vast opening knowledge from decades of practice.
So if you could do 500 a day you would have even better results than me perhaps. Again, it's not for everyone, unless you are serious about your time and want the biggest bang for your bucks.
For best results I would say only play players rated higher than you and don't worry about your rating. When you go back to standard chess like rapid time controls, you might actually be bored by it and stop playing it.
I mated one master rated almost 2500 in standard chess, and rarely play rapid or blitz and mostly focus on Chess 960 or doing puzzles now. Doing tactics, is actually the best part of chess for me, so why not do tactics the most?
Now, @Username_taken12 disagreed with Bobby Fischer and this other GM about Chess 960 and the amount of puzzles you should do daily but that is fine, you can get results as fast or as slow as you want in chess. If you want to do 20 puzzles a day and pour over them, that works too, just remember, time is the most valuable thing you have, especially at my age, hahaha.
Also, the basic endgame positions like Lucena and Philidor will win you so many games, it's hard to believe. Because rook and pawn endgames happen so often. This is the advice of Jeremy Silman and not my idea. You don't need to know a lot of endgame theory or buy a ton of books, but I would suggest you find a copy of his Complete Endgame Course and read up on what you should expect from a 1400-1600 player in regards to endgame knowledge. Hope that clears things up. Cheers.
Hey @street-magic while some of what I said was meant to be humorous tongue-in-cheek, most was quite serious and should of been explained better. So here goes....the pushup part was very serious if you want to get stronger generally at chess too. There is nothing like some discomfort to compel your mind to find shortcuts to eliminate pain.
Doing 500 puzzles a day will help you better than anything you can possibly do, in my experience of studying chess for 50 years. It's certainly not my idea, but I watched a YouTube video about the secrets of strong players and the GM suggested to become obsessed with doing tactics and it was best to do as much as possible, 500-1000 a day. He just kept saying that over and over. It still didn't sink in because....
When I heard him say this I didn't understand how that was possible because there wasn't something like Puzzle Storm or Puzzle Streak that came much later, so doing this many puzzles seemed impossible because many puzzles from books take quite a bit of time to solve.
However, he was talking about very simple puzzles and doing a ton of them because it is about pattern recognition and not the complexity of the puzzle. Times and methods have changed in the last 50 years, and I don't use books much any more, because there are apps and new technology to learn. Instead of doing 2 very difficult mate in two puzzles, it is much better to spend that time doing 100 simple puzzles because all tactics stem from skeletal ideas and there are only 5 families of tactics. Since January I solved over 40000 puzzles and noticed my biggest rating jump in my life.
The reason why Chess 960 is so good is because there was this famous GM called Bobby Fischer that invented it and called it New Chess and said it was the purest form of chess. I didn't believe him for the first 25 years or so because I didn't know anyone that played it or that it took about a minute to learn the rules.
I've beaten several strong masters in Chess 960.
Now, they didn't have a rating of 2200 plus at Chess 960 but they did at standard chess at either bullet, blitz, rapid or classic time controls. In fact I beat a friend of mine that is a NM for the first time in over 25 years because I didn't have to worry about his opening knowledge and instead I was superior tactically to him because of my muscle memory of doing about 300 tactics a day for months. It was an awesome boost of confidence that I will never get from playing him standard chess because of his vast opening knowledge from decades of practice.
So if you could do 500 a day you would have even better results than me perhaps. Again, it's not for everyone, unless you are serious about your time and want the biggest bang for your bucks.
For best results I would say only play players rated higher than you and don't worry about your rating. When you go back to standard chess like rapid time controls, you might actually be bored by it and stop playing it.
I mated one master rated almost 2500 in standard chess, and rarely play rapid or blitz and mostly focus on Chess 960 or doing puzzles now. Doing tactics, is actually the best part of chess for me, so why not do tactics the most?
Now, @Username_taken12 disagreed with Bobby Fischer and this other GM about Chess 960 and the amount of puzzles you should do daily but that is fine, you can get results as fast or as slow as you want in chess. If you want to do 20 puzzles a day and pour over them, that works too, just remember, time is the most valuable thing you have, especially at my age, hahaha.
Also, the basic endgame positions like Lucena and Philidor will win you so many games, it's hard to believe. Because rook and pawn endgames happen so often. This is the advice of Jeremy Silman and not my idea. You don't need to know a lot of endgame theory or buy a ton of books, but I would suggest you find a copy of his Complete Endgame Course and read up on what you should expect from a 1400-1600 player in regards to endgame knowledge. Hope that clears things up. Cheers.