I used to get about 100 points on when I won any game, and similar points when I lost. But as I have played dozens of game, I noticed there is a decrement of points I win/loss. It means the ratings will stabilize (when winning/losing points won't be much). So, how many games should be played to get to that level?
Same question
The answer is more than 30 games to remove the question mark/stabilize your rating
Then your rating deviation will be less than 90 at least
@omabhyankar , not true. I played 51 games against Leela bot ( win 2, 3 draw, 46 losses) in my rapid .
I am still provisional after 51 games.
RD delta depend also opponent u play
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glicko_rating_system
see step 3 in the calculation.From those formulas it looks to me if you play lot stronger or lot weaker players RD will go slowly down as therea are mostly wins or mostly losses. Obviously just losing winnind narrows down you rating very little so makes sense
#4 I thought bot games diod not count.
#5 Rd usually goes down, but also can go up. If you suddenly lose strength or win strength, then Rd adjust accordingly.
https://lichess.org/Zl0vWTaK
seems to be rated bot game. I guess limitted strength bots do exist also as rated. amazingly strong given that is does not tactical analysis
Yeah RD can go up if results are unexpected. Not case in drmboss games. results are as expected.
there seems to load of bots with rating
https://lichess.org/player/bots
The bots get a rating, but not sure humans get rating from playing bots.
If you look at linked game you see that @drmrboss got 68 rating points from it. so it seems. Quite possible that rating change wa s computed but did not actually happen`?
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.