@TheDeepKing said in #1:
I would like to know what my real score is because I don't understand anything
Why all these differences?? I don't know what my level is (I only play online.) Indeed, according to the official FIDE site, I would be AFM Arena Fide Master..Obviously a fake title that is worth nothing, another site really full of cheaters, but that's another matter.
So which evaluation should I refer to?? Thank you!
<I snipped a bit for space and brevity>
Who said that Elo rating is an evaluation of anything? It isn't.
Professor Elo's rating system was never intended to evaluate chess players' abilities. It doesn't evaluate anything. It measures. It is strictly a measurement of past success. Now yes, good players are, over the long haul, more successful than weak players, but his system does not pretend to predict when those stronger players will prevail, nor how. It measures what has happened, not what might. Much the way a racing form tells you which horse has won it's last 5 races, but doesn't tell you which horse will will the next.
What is your level? that wholly depends on which pool of players you are referring to. Ratings based on the Elo system are not transferable from one website or even time control to another. And they fluctuate, depending on results. Sometimes wildly at short time controls, when you play a lot in a short time. You have different ratings at different chess sites and at different time controls? That is absolutely normal. What would be crazy, very much "something fishy is going on here" odd is if you had exactly the same rating across several chess sites and time controls.
Cheaters have very little, if anything to do with differences between ratings in one system or pool and another. But if you're inclined to believe yourself entitled to more rating points than you have, and to blame someone for your rating shortfall; go ahead and accuse nameless others of cheating. You aren't the first, won't be the last.
@TheDeepKing said in #1:
> I would like to know what my real score is because I don't understand anything
> Why all these differences?? I don't know what my level is (I only play online.) Indeed, according to the official FIDE site, I would be AFM Arena Fide Master..Obviously a fake title that is worth nothing, another site really full of cheaters, but that's another matter.
> So which evaluation should I refer to?? Thank you!
<I snipped a bit for space and brevity>
Who said that Elo rating is an evaluation of anything? It isn't.
Professor Elo's rating system was never intended to evaluate chess players' abilities. It doesn't evaluate anything. It measures. It is strictly a measurement of past success. Now yes, good players are, over the long haul, more successful than weak players, but his system does not pretend to predict when those stronger players will prevail, nor how. It measures what has happened, not what might. Much the way a racing form tells you which horse has won it's last 5 races, but doesn't tell you which horse will will the next.
What is your level? that wholly depends on which pool of players you are referring to. Ratings based on the Elo system are not transferable from one website or even time control to another. And they fluctuate, depending on results. Sometimes wildly at short time controls, when you play a lot in a short time. You have different ratings at different chess sites and at different time controls? That is absolutely normal. What would be crazy, very much "something fishy is going on here" odd is if you had exactly the same rating across several chess sites and time controls.
Cheaters have very little, if anything to do with differences between ratings in one system or pool and another. But if you're inclined to believe yourself entitled to more rating points than you have, and to blame someone for your rating shortfall; go ahead and accuse nameless others of cheating. You aren't the first, won't be the last.