Can I use Chess engine assistence whe playing with a friend • page 2/2 • General Chess Discussion • lichess.org

Dr_King_Schultz

#11

Of course it is never allowed to use an engine without your opponent's approval. Why do people even ask?

seanysean

#12

?? Dont you know thibault, the owner of lichess, read this?!

seanysean

#13

Oops, #12 was directed @#10

Tassel

#14

I know this, don't worry.
But I also reported.

I know this, don't worry. But I also reported.

Tassel

#15

I found this game strange (if I compare to the rest of his games).

http://fr.lichess.org/ME1RNTF6#5

Please, block him quickly.

I found this game strange (if I compare to the rest of his games). http://fr.lichess.org/ME1RNTF6#5 Please, block him quickly.

sprasad

#16

You all are fools. You may, like I do, use an engine in any game, unrated or rated. you just have to be sure thibby doesn't catch you ;)

btw, I may or may not be serious in this post. you decide!

TEEHEE

You all are fools. You may, like I do, use an engine in any game, unrated or rated. you just have to be sure thibby doesn't catch you ;) btw, I may or may not be serious in this post. you decide! TEEHEE

Toutatis

#17

I checked some of your games. They were very interesting, Sprasad.

sprasad

#18

Post a couple, Tooter ;)

Toutatis

#19

http://en.lichess.org/3eZIAyKx/black
http://en.lichess.org/LrgHo5Tn/black
http://en.lichess.org/ptvdWCp4
http://en.lichess.org/RFNtHPCh
http://en.lichess.org/RnXA1moY (move 23 is called 'suspicious' in chat)

What intrigued me was the near perfection of your play at times, when compared to the (no offence intended) less than mediocre results you have in tournaments.

http://en.lichess.org/@/sprasad/tournaments/recent

Let us look at this defeat, for example, in one of the highly scrutinised arenas: http://en.lichess.org/Y6gUvJo7

You're obviously a pretty good player, but... that's a heavy defeat, by checkmate, to an opponent rated nearly 500 below you.

I am not, of course, accusing you of anything. I am a mere journeyman at chess. These do, however, look very interesting from the perspective of someone who is interested in examining games for such things as genius moves or cheating.

Those who belong to the CIA and make jocular claims that they are cheating in threads, have been outed as cheats a ridiculously high number of times. It's a psychological condition called Narcissism.

Anyway, interesting stuff that is probably completely irrelevant.

http://en.lichess.org/3eZIAyKx/black http://en.lichess.org/LrgHo5Tn/black http://en.lichess.org/ptvdWCp4 http://en.lichess.org/RFNtHPCh http://en.lichess.org/RnXA1moY (move 23 is called 'suspicious' in chat) What intrigued me was the near perfection of your play at times, when compared to the (no offence intended) less than mediocre results you have in tournaments. http://en.lichess.org/@/sprasad/tournaments/recent Let us look at this defeat, for example, in one of the highly scrutinised arenas: http://en.lichess.org/Y6gUvJo7 You're obviously a pretty good player, but... that's a heavy defeat, by checkmate, to an opponent rated nearly 500 below you. I am not, of course, accusing you of anything. I am a mere journeyman at chess. These do, however, look very interesting from the perspective of someone who is interested in examining games for such things as genius moves or cheating. Those who belong to the CIA and make jocular claims that they are cheating in threads, have been outed as cheats a ridiculously high number of times. It's a psychological condition called Narcissism. Anyway, interesting stuff that is probably completely irrelevant.