lichess.org
Donate

Bullet chess is one of fighting sports. Unlike any other games. Bullet isn't a game.

Energies are necessary to win in the games of 1 minutes.
You keep losts when you're tired.
That's better not to play when you're tired.
Bullet is the same as one of fighting sports.
It's completely different as any other games.

Bullet isn't a game.
Old mentality ^^. Video games are becoming recognized as sports. No, its not for learning but bullet is the future of Chess, you already see top players play nothing but bullet online, and even with the low time limit still play better games than 99% of us.
I mean blundering everything for the sake of time. There are still some sensible people who play chess instead.
Predicting flagged moves, calculating under a minute, all of that makes bullet a sport. imo
Top players play bullet now because when they were not top players they probably concentrated on classical chess. It's no coincidence that the world's best bullet player is also the world's best classical chess player.
What I'd have liked to say is that players should play Bullet Chess when their energies are enough and shouldn't play Bullet Chess when they're tired and have few energies since they keep losts.

@AlkinKing
You should behave like an adult and learn how to write clean English sentences first before insulting other people as "Old mentality^^".
@Idasca Since its a non-formal form post and you got the idea ill assume my English was good enough. Also I did not mean "old mentality" as an insult.
I think Bullet and blitz is not a chess. It is just fun and waste of time. Look at the puzzles at lichess. None of them seen during the game. 2000+ level players didn't see briilant moves. Because in 3-5 minute game, you think "time" more than "good game".
Bullet is not only "real chess" but it is the only valid form of testing actual skill since the barrier to cheat is higher. Anyone that has a blitz rating over 2200 and a sub 1800 bullet rating I do not trust.

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.