@Lorentius said in #101:
> While it's true that most news outlets (specially the big ones) have conflict of interests, the evidence is overwhelming. If you don't believe any news outlets which have possible skewed information, then why are you repeating talking points spewed by Russian media and the media sympathetic to it? Enlighten me with your oh so neutral sources, I'm curious.
>
> Also, it's very convenient that you mark everything that disagrees with you as propaganda, you can't possibly tell me that in 6 minutes you have researched the journalistic integrity of 6 outlets. Reconsider your live choices, because your current ones make you look like a clown.
I look at what is beneficial to one side and what is beneficial to the other side. I explore both points of view, and draw my own conclusions. What specific question are you interested in?
> While it's true that most news outlets (specially the big ones) have conflict of interests, the evidence is overwhelming. If you don't believe any news outlets which have possible skewed information, then why are you repeating talking points spewed by Russian media and the media sympathetic to it? Enlighten me with your oh so neutral sources, I'm curious.
>
> Also, it's very convenient that you mark everything that disagrees with you as propaganda, you can't possibly tell me that in 6 minutes you have researched the journalistic integrity of 6 outlets. Reconsider your live choices, because your current ones make you look like a clown.
I look at what is beneficial to one side and what is beneficial to the other side. I explore both points of view, and draw my own conclusions. What specific question are you interested in?
