- Blind mode tutorial
lichess.org
Donate

75% cheaters on chess.com, 85% on lichess

End of chess for me. I will close my account (already done on chess.com). Since 10 days i didn't met 1 players who don't use stockfish (or another tools).

I screen more 50 players on lichess, record some videos and sent some screens of computer to admin (and people who think we can't get IP on lichess.chess.com, continue to stay naive).
I continue to think chess will disappear because of that, more 70% players use a bot or help tools for play (85% there) between 800-1200 elo.

The security is equivalent to game on navigator of game begin 2000's years, otherwise told = very weak. I use a tools for see computer of player, installed and set by children who has 9 years old. Then it doesn't old people who don't accept the real life who will give me lesson about it's possible or not.

Unfortunaly play in these environment isn't for me, i cancel my tournement IRL also, i show them some record in "direct" also for proove.

Good luck

End of chess for me. I will close my account (already done on chess.com). Since 10 days i didn't met 1 players who don't use stockfish (or another tools). I screen more 50 players on lichess, record some videos and sent some screens of computer to admin (and people who think we can't get IP on lichess.chess.com, continue to stay naive). I continue to think chess will disappear because of that, more 70% players use a bot or help tools for play (85% there) between 800-1200 elo. The security is equivalent to game on navigator of game begin 2000's years, otherwise told = very weak. I use a tools for see computer of player, installed and set by children who has 9 years old. Then it doesn't old people who don't accept the real life who will give me lesson about it's possible or not. Unfortunaly play in these environment isn't for me, i cancel my tournement IRL also, i show them some record in "direct" also for proove. Good luck

@Ecamvelo said in #1:

I use a tools for see computer of player, installed and set by children who has 9 years old. Then it doesn't old people who don't accept the real life who will give me lesson about it's possible or not.

Any ideas what does the author mean?

@Ecamvelo said in #1: > I use a tools for see computer of player, installed and set by children who has 9 years old. Then it doesn't old people who don't accept the real life who will give me lesson about it's possible or not. Any ideas what does the author mean?

yeah Bruh, that s what I ve said, very well Done, I believed there are a lot of cheating, and My Guess is Correct, Thx for that(still You won't see it sadly) BUT that work needs to be done not only for under 1200( which are mosty kids,rather want that use more than others) but among all ratings, and really see , how things are among all ages and ratings.

yeah Bruh, that s what I ve said, very well Done, I believed there are a lot of cheating, and My Guess is Correct, Thx for that(still You won't see it sadly) BUT that work needs to be done not only for under 1200( which are mosty kids,rather want that use more than others) but among all ratings, and really see , how things are among all ages and ratings.

Sounds like one of those annoying guys who keep telling me they installed a trojan on my computer and have been watching me visiting naughty pages. Those also try sounding like big bad haxxors but the result is just pathetic...

Sounds like one of those annoying guys who keep telling me they installed a trojan on my computer and have been watching me visiting naughty pages. Those also try sounding like big bad haxxors but the result is just pathetic...

If 75% are cheating, then how do I win 56% of the time?
I don't think I've ever defeated the handicapped stockfish level 6 on lichess.
I do win against the handicapped level 5, but only about 50% of the time.
So if 75% are cheating with a decent bot, there is no way I can win.
Unless they only cheat during certain moves, for example in the middle-game, but I don't know how that would work.
It seems like a lot of effort to cheat for very little reward. I doubt that very many people do it.

If 75% are cheating, then how do I win 56% of the time? I don't think I've ever defeated the handicapped stockfish level 6 on lichess. I do win against the handicapped level 5, but only about 50% of the time. So if 75% are cheating with a decent bot, there is no way I can win. Unless they only cheat during certain moves, for example in the middle-game, but I don't know how that would work. It seems like a lot of effort to cheat for very little reward. I doubt that very many people do it.

Where did bro pull out these statistics from?

Where did bro pull out these statistics from?

From his faulty magician's hat.

From his faulty magician's hat.

@Grumpymantooth said in #5:

If 75% are cheating, then how do I win 56% of the time?
I don't think I've ever defeated the handicapped stockfish level 6 on lichess.
I do win against the handicapped level 5, but only about 50% of the time.
So if 75% are cheating with a decent bot, there is no way I can win.
Unless they only cheat during certain moves, for example in the middle-game, but I don't know how that would work.
It seems like a lot of effort to cheat for very little reward. I doubt that very many people do it.
He said only about under 1200 ratings, percent of cheating there can be higher, than on 1700 for example

@Grumpymantooth said in #5: > If 75% are cheating, then how do I win 56% of the time? > I don't think I've ever defeated the handicapped stockfish level 6 on lichess. > I do win against the handicapped level 5, but only about 50% of the time. > So if 75% are cheating with a decent bot, there is no way I can win. > Unless they only cheat during certain moves, for example in the middle-game, but I don't know how that would work. > It seems like a lot of effort to cheat for very little reward. I doubt that very many people do it. He said only about under 1200 ratings, percent of cheating there can be higher, than on 1700 for example

@Random_Noob_787 said in #6:

Where did bro pull out these statistics from?

Secret Kramnik Files.

@Random_Noob_787 said in #6: > Where did bro pull out these statistics from? Secret Kramnik Files.

YADKP = Yet another Dunning-Kurger post!

YADKP = Yet another Dunning-Kurger post!

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.