Wow, move 73 one option is just nuts! Would anybody take the pawn and put their Q there?

I love how the qxc5 works. I would play qc4 but qxc5 just seems stupid but in actual fact it's the most fun win going. I wish I played that.

ANYWAY, I was wondering would any of you take the pawn? Is it obvious, did I miss an obvious move or I that some computer shx!? Just seems risky putting my Q up for grabs.

Sorry, none of this makes any sense.

Qxc5 doesnt even work.

How to remove the is question. @MrPushwood @ChessPlayer2705

The Qxc5 was not at this position. I was analysing the game and was some nuts computer line I was supposed to post.

I can't even find the position where qxc5 makes any sense now and I been looking through a lot trying to find that particular position but I can't.

So yes, i agree it nakes no sense in this position and i cant find the line/position that the computer found during analysis.

I'm gonna guess the line was 36 Rh7 Qf8 37 Qxc5.

huh??? 73??? isnt that move 37????

Also, if this is how 1250s play, I should be in 1500 right now...

The OP is (presumably) using half-moves.

Hey why are peole dislikeing my post in #7? Im telling the truth...

@GiGGidi So does the line in #5 sound right?