- Blind mode tutorial
lichess.org
Donate

What you think about that game :)

@mrbasso said in #9:

What are you talking about?? Qxb2 4.Nbd2 is better for white.

4.Nbd2 then human play goes g6 5. e4 Qc3 6. Bd3 Bg7 7. O-O and absolutely fine for black, 1 point for me

Better is 3...d5

irrelevant move played by less than 3 percent of lichess, 1 point for me

or 3...Nf6 but then 4.Qc1

  1. Qc1 g6 5. c3 Bg7 6. Nbd2 O-O 7. e4 d6 8. Bd3 Nbd7 9. O-O and absolutely fine for black, 1 point for me

total score is 3 - 0 for me

next

@mrbasso said in #9: > What are you talking about?? Qxb2 4.Nbd2 is better for white. 4.Nbd2 then human play goes g6 5. e4 Qc3 6. Bd3 Bg7 7. O-O and absolutely fine for black, 1 point for me > Better is 3...d5 irrelevant move played by less than 3 percent of lichess, 1 point for me > or 3...Nf6 but then 4.Qc1 4. Qc1 g6 5. c3 Bg7 6. Nbd2 O-O 7. e4 d6 8. Bd3 Nbd7 9. O-O and absolutely fine for black, 1 point for me total score is 3 - 0 for me next

Ähm sorry but opening is just one part of the game. You only speak about how to handle the london opening, but for me the opening isnt the most interesting part of that game. I shared this game because of the middle game, which is full of strategy and tactic.

ok i admit stonewall can block london but i prefer to be aggressive early on the warpath

> Ähm sorry but opening is just one part of the game. You only speak about how to handle the london opening, but for me the opening isnt the most interesting part of that game. I shared this game because of the middle game, which is full of strategy and tactic. ok i admit stonewall can block london but i prefer to be aggressive early on the warpath

Human play?? You rather mean human Patzer play? Your first line is completely lost for black of course.

3-0 for you but OTB it would be 3-0 for me...

Human play?? You rather mean human Patzer play? Your first line is completely lost for black of course. 3-0 for you but OTB it would be 3-0 for me...

Human play?? You rather mean human Patzer play? Your first line is completely lost for black of course.

i dont know about that anything within plus or minus 3 eval is fair game in blitz, as you know

3-0 for you but OTB it would be 3-0 for me...

probably, but i am a very sore loser so after the first loss the situation may spiral out of hand

> Human play?? You rather mean human Patzer play? Your first line is completely lost for black of course. i dont know about that anything within plus or minus 3 eval is fair game in blitz, as you know > 3-0 for you but OTB it would be 3-0 for me... probably, but i am a very sore loser so after the first loss the situation may spiral out of hand

"anything within plus or minus 3 eval is fair game in blitz"
'The winning of a pawn among good players of even strength often means the winning of the game.' - Capablanca

  • That counts even in blitz, provided you do not flag or hang a piece.
"anything within plus or minus 3 eval is fair game in blitz" 'The winning of a pawn among good players of even strength often means the winning of the game.' - Capablanca * That counts even in blitz, provided you do not flag or hang a piece.

ok fair point, if its capablanca i have very little chance to win, i will employ drastic psychological measures to try and close the elo gap [i will also most likely be banned and escorted out by security but these are my problems to deal with]

ok fair point, if its capablanca i have very little chance to win, i will employ drastic psychological measures to try and close the elo gap [i will also most likely be banned and escorted out by security but these are my problems to deal with]

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.