This is the same game analysed just to see if it was possible and if the results of the analyses was the same. They are not.
[Site "https://lichess.org/uX6ktkMc"]
- e4 b6 { B00 Owen Defense } 2. d4 Bb7 3. Bd3 g6 4. c3 Bg7 5. Qe2 d6 6. Nf3 Nd7 7. O-O e6 8. Bg5 f6 9. Bh4 g5 10. Bg3 h5 11. h4 g4 12. Nh2 Qe7 13. Nd2 O-O-O 14. a4 Nh6?! { (1.87 → 3.02) Inaccuracy. Best move was f5. } (14... f5 15. a5) 15. a5 f5? { (2.52 → 4.51) Mistake. Best move was Nb8. } (15... Nb8 16. axb6) 16. axb6 Nxb6?! { (4.44 → 7.39) Inaccuracy. Best move was axb6. } (16... axb6 17. exf5 e5 18. Ba6 Nb8 19. Bxb7+ Kxb7 20. dxe5 Bxe5 21. Qe4+ d5 22. Qxe5 Qxe5 23. Bxe5) 17. Ba6? { (7.39 → 3.56) Mistake. Best move was Rxa7. } (17. Rxa7 Kb8 18. Rfa1 e5 19. exf5 c6 20. Nb3 Nc8 21. Rxb7+ Qxb7 22. Na5 Qb6 23. Nc4 Qb7) 17... Bxa6?? { (3.56 → 15.33) Blunder. Best move was c6. } (17... c6) 18. Qxa6+ Kd7 19. Qb5+ c6 20. Rxa7+ { Black resigns. } 1-0
First time analysed
0 Inaccuracies
1 Mistakes
0 Blunders
29 Average centipawn loss
Learn from your mistakes
2 Inaccuracies
1 Mistakes
1 Blunders
81 Average centipawn loss
[Site "https://lichess.org/TLNbZqEU"]
- e4 b6 { B00 Owen Defense } 2. d4 Bb7 3. Bd3 g6 4. c3 Bg7 5. Qe2 d6 6. Nf3 Nd7 7. O-O e6 8. Bg5 f6 9. Bh4 g5 10. Bg3 h5 11. h4 g4 12. Nh2 Qe7 13. Nd2 O-O-O?! { (1.20 → 2.02) Inaccuracy. Best move was Nh6. } (13... Nh6) 14. a4 Nh6?! { (2.05 → 2.77) Inaccuracy. Best move was Nb8. } (14... Nb8 15. a5) 15. a5 f5? { (2.85 → 4.77) Mistake. Best move was Nb8. } (15... Nb8 16. axb6 axb6 17. Ra7 Nc6 18. Ra4 Nb8 19. Rfa1 f5 20. exf5 Rhf8 21. Qxe6+ Qxe6 22. fxe6) 16. axb6 Nxb6? { (4.31 → 7.58) Mistake. Best move was axb6. } (16... axb6 17. exf5 Nb8 18. fxe6 Rhf8 19. Ra7 Nc6 20. Rxb7 Kxb7 21. d5 Na7 22. Ra1 Ra8 23. Bg6) 17. Ba6? { (7.58 → 4.09) Mistake. Best move was Rxa7. } (17. Rxa7) 17... Bxa6? { (4.09 → 15.30) Mistake. Best move was c6. } (17... c6 18. Nc4) 18. Qxa6+ Kd7 19. Qb5+ c6 20. Rxa7+ { Black resigns. } 1-0
Computer analysis
Imported analyses ... Second time analysed
0 Inaccuracies
1 Mistakes
0 Blunders
27 Average centipawn loss
Learn from your mistakes
2 Inaccuracies
3 Mistakes
0 Blunders
80 Average centipawn loss
This is the same game analysed just to see if it was possible and if the results of the analyses was the same. They are not.
[Site "https://lichess.org/uX6ktkMc"]
1. e4 b6 { B00 Owen Defense } 2. d4 Bb7 3. Bd3 g6 4. c3 Bg7 5. Qe2 d6 6. Nf3 Nd7 7. O-O e6 8. Bg5 f6 9. Bh4 g5 10. Bg3 h5 11. h4 g4 12. Nh2 Qe7 13. Nd2 O-O-O 14. a4 Nh6?! { (1.87 → 3.02) Inaccuracy. Best move was f5. } (14... f5 15. a5) 15. a5 f5? { (2.52 → 4.51) Mistake. Best move was Nb8. } (15... Nb8 16. axb6) 16. axb6 Nxb6?! { (4.44 → 7.39) Inaccuracy. Best move was axb6. } (16... axb6 17. exf5 e5 18. Ba6 Nb8 19. Bxb7+ Kxb7 20. dxe5 Bxe5 21. Qe4+ d5 22. Qxe5 Qxe5 23. Bxe5) 17. Ba6? { (7.39 → 3.56) Mistake. Best move was Rxa7. } (17. Rxa7 Kb8 18. Rfa1 e5 19. exf5 c6 20. Nb3 Nc8 21. Rxb7+ Qxb7 22. Na5 Qb6 23. Nc4 Qb7) 17... Bxa6?? { (3.56 → 15.33) Blunder. Best move was c6. } (17... c6) 18. Qxa6+ Kd7 19. Qb5+ c6 20. Rxa7+ { Black resigns. } 1-0
First time analysed
0 Inaccuracies
1 Mistakes
0 Blunders
29 Average centipawn loss
Learn from your mistakes
2 Inaccuracies
1 Mistakes
1 Blunders
81 Average centipawn loss
[Site "https://lichess.org/TLNbZqEU"]
1. e4 b6 { B00 Owen Defense } 2. d4 Bb7 3. Bd3 g6 4. c3 Bg7 5. Qe2 d6 6. Nf3 Nd7 7. O-O e6 8. Bg5 f6 9. Bh4 g5 10. Bg3 h5 11. h4 g4 12. Nh2 Qe7 13. Nd2 O-O-O?! { (1.20 → 2.02) Inaccuracy. Best move was Nh6. } (13... Nh6) 14. a4 Nh6?! { (2.05 → 2.77) Inaccuracy. Best move was Nb8. } (14... Nb8 15. a5) 15. a5 f5? { (2.85 → 4.77) Mistake. Best move was Nb8. } (15... Nb8 16. axb6 axb6 17. Ra7 Nc6 18. Ra4 Nb8 19. Rfa1 f5 20. exf5 Rhf8 21. Qxe6+ Qxe6 22. fxe6) 16. axb6 Nxb6? { (4.31 → 7.58) Mistake. Best move was axb6. } (16... axb6 17. exf5 Nb8 18. fxe6 Rhf8 19. Ra7 Nc6 20. Rxb7 Kxb7 21. d5 Na7 22. Ra1 Ra8 23. Bg6) 17. Ba6? { (7.58 → 4.09) Mistake. Best move was Rxa7. } (17. Rxa7) 17... Bxa6? { (4.09 → 15.30) Mistake. Best move was c6. } (17... c6 18. Nc4) 18. Qxa6+ Kd7 19. Qb5+ c6 20. Rxa7+ { Black resigns. } 1-0
Computer analysis
Imported analyses ... Second time analysed
0 Inaccuracies
1 Mistakes
0 Blunders
27 Average centipawn loss
Learn from your mistakes
2 Inaccuracies
3 Mistakes
0 Blunders
80 Average centipawn loss