<Comment deleted by user>
I thought of an old (slow) game of mine as an illustration of this topic:
https://lichess.org/study/siQErqzH/a2OOdiXg
I thought of an old (slow) game of mine as an illustration of this topic:
https://lichess.org/study/siQErqzH/a2OOdiXg
This could make a really good idea for a chess website training. If you don't want to create such a tactical training website maybe Lichess can add it on?
This could make a really good idea for a chess website training. If you don't want to create such a tactical training website maybe Lichess can add it on?
I like unrealistkc squares
Solve the problem!
I like unrealistkc squares
Solve the problem!
It's always a good idea to keep in mind where your pieces belong, ideally. This can lead to some very interesting strategic plans, and as in all things chess, everything is connected in some way.
It's always a good idea to keep in mind where your pieces belong, ideally. This can lead to some very interesting strategic plans, and as in all things chess, everything is connected in some way.
Can you share the source code for your program?
Can you share the source code for your program?
Cool ideas, although Fairy-Stockfish (crazyhouse) could be used to reduce coding work. :-)
For example, set your FEN in https://lichess.org/analysis/crazyhouse with the piece in hand... or, if running Fairy-SF from a terminal, even better: https://www.chessprogramming.org/UCI allows specifying which move(s) / drop(s) to search using "go searchmoves" etc.
Cool ideas, although Fairy-Stockfish (crazyhouse) could be used to reduce coding work. :-)
For example, set your FEN in https://lichess.org/analysis/crazyhouse with the piece in hand... or, if running Fairy-SF from a terminal, even better: https://www.chessprogramming.org/UCI allows specifying which move(s) / drop(s) to search using "go searchmoves" etc.
disregarding squares because there exists a tactic is a problem, because what if that square is the optimal one regardless of tactics?
disregarding squares because there exists a tactic is a problem, because what if that square is the optimal one regardless of tactics?
@Toadofsky said in #17:
Cool ideas, although Fairy-Stockfish (crazyhouse) could be used to reduce coding work. :-)
For example, set your FEN in lichess.org/analysis/crazyhouse with the piece in hand... or, if running Fairy-SF from a terminal, even better: www.chessprogramming.org/UCI allows specifying which move(s) / drop(s) to search using "go searchmoves" etc.
Not to be a jerk, but I must have been thinking of the "bughouse" (or "placement") variant I added to Multi-Variant Stockfish where captured pieces aren't added to a player's hand and assuming other engines also supported this variant (whereas in crazyhouse, captured pieces are added to a player's hand).
@Toadofsky said in #17:
> Cool ideas, although Fairy-Stockfish (crazyhouse) could be used to reduce coding work. :-)
>
> For example, set your FEN in lichess.org/analysis/crazyhouse with the piece in hand... or, if running Fairy-SF from a terminal, even better: www.chessprogramming.org/UCI allows specifying which move(s) / drop(s) to search using "go searchmoves" etc.
Not to be a jerk, but I must have been thinking of the "bughouse" (or "placement") variant I added to Multi-Variant Stockfish where captured pieces aren't added to a player's hand and assuming other engines also supported this variant (whereas in crazyhouse, captured pieces are added to a player's hand).
@Chess0315 said in #2:
> No.
He knows it and you are worse than him



