lichess.org
Donate
45:00
45:00
12345678abcdefgh
+0.3
SF 16 · 7MBNNUE
in local browser
1d4+0.3d5+0.42e4?−0.9...Mistake. c4 was best.2.c4e63.Nc3[...]2...c6?+0.4Mistake. dxe4 was best.2...dxe43.Nc3Nf6[...]3Nc3+0.3dxe4+0.54Nxe4+0.3Bf5+0.45Qf3+0.1Bxe4+0.66Qxe4+0.5Nf6+0.47Qf4+0.4e6+0.48c30.0Bd60.09Qf3−0.1O-O−0.310Bg5−0.6Nbd7−0.511Bd3−0.5Be7?!+0.1Inaccuracy. Qa5 was best.11...Qa512.Bxf6Nxf6[...]12Ne2+0.1e5+0.313Bf5?!−0.3...Inaccuracy. Qh3 was best.13.Qh3g614.O-O[...]13...Re80.014O-O−0.5Qc7?!+0.1Inaccuracy. e4 was best.14...e415.Qg3g6[...]15Rad1+0.1Rad8+0.216dxe5?!−0.8...Inaccuracy. Bc2 was best.16.Bc2Qa517.Ng3[...]16...Nxe5−0.817Qh3−0.6Nd5??#2Checkmate is now unavoidable. h6 was best.17...h618.Rxd818Qxh7+#1
1-0
Black resigned • White is victorious
Computer analysisMove timesCrosstableShare & export
FEN
[Event "Rated classical game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/rr2Uyyrm"] [Date "2022.03.20"] [White "bornacavrag"] [Black "dnlhlt"] [Result "1-0"] [GameId "rr2Uyyrm"] [UTCDate "2022.03.20"] [UTCTime "14:57:38"] [WhiteElo "1501"] [BlackElo "1396"] [WhiteRatingDiff "+17"] [BlackRatingDiff "-10"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "2700+45"] [ECO "B18"] [Opening "Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation"] [Termination "Normal"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1. d4 d5 2. e4? { (0.39 → -0.87) Mistake. c4 was best. } (2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. cxd5 exd5 5. Bg5 Be7 6. e3 h6) 2... c6? { (-0.87 → 0.42) Mistake. dxe4 was best. } (2... dxe4 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. f3 exf3 5. Nxf3 c6 6. Bd3 Bg4 7. Be3) 3. Nc3 dxe4 4. Nxe4 Bf5 { B18 Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation } 5. Qf3 Bxe4 6. Qxe4 Nf6 7. Qf4 e6 8. c3 Bd6 9. Qf3 O-O 10. Bg5 Nbd7 11. Bd3 Be7?! { (-0.53 → 0.14) Inaccuracy. Qa5 was best. } (11... Qa5 12. Bxf6 Nxf6 13. g3 e5 14. dxe5 Bxe5 15. Ne2 g6 16. O-O Kg7 17. Bc4 Rad8 18. Nc1) 12. Ne2 e5 13. Bf5?! { (0.34 → -0.35) Inaccuracy. Qh3 was best. } (13. Qh3 g6 14. O-O Nd5 15. Bh6 Re8 16. Rad1 Bf8 17. Bc1 Bg7 18. dxe5 Nxe5 19. Bc2 Qc8) 13... Re8 14. O-O Qc7?! { (-0.51 → 0.13) Inaccuracy. e4 was best. } (14... e4 15. Qg3 g6 16. Nf4 Qa5 17. Bxd7 Nxd7 18. Bh6 Bd6 19. Qh3 Nf6 20. a4 Nd5 21. Qh4) 15. Rad1 Rad8 16. dxe5?! { (0.18 → -0.81) Inaccuracy. Bc2 was best. } (16. Bc2 Qa5 17. Ng3 exd4 18. Nf5 Bf8 19. Rxd4 Qxa2 20. Qg3 g6 21. Qh4 Qxb2 22. Bxf6 Nxf6) 16... Nxe5 17. Qh3 Nd5?? { (-0.65 → Mate in 2) Checkmate is now unavoidable. h6 was best. } (17... h6 18. Rxd8) 18. Qxh7+ { Black resigns. } 1-0
10
bornacavragdnlhlt
10
bornacavrag +17
2 Inaccuracies
1 Mistake
0 Blunders
29 Average centipawn loss
89%Accuracy
Learn from your mistakes
dnlhlt −10
2 Inaccuracies
1 Mistake
1 Blunder
88 Average centipawn loss
59%Accuracy
Recommended puzzle training
Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation
  1. dnlhlt I figure since that bishop gets traded off in the mainline anyway that's not a terrible move, and I get to develop with tempo
  2. dnlhlt wait crap no damn it wow that is bad
  3. dnlhlt okay so that's definitely a major weakness of mine
  4. dnlhlt looking at a threat, determining it is covered so I dismiss it, and then I go ahead and do something with the piece that covered it
  5. dnlhlt wow
  6. bornacavrag Yeah, it happens. But up to that point it was a really good effort
  7. bornacavrag thats The trick with this opening, it’s objectively bad but it creates an opportunity to make a mistake on every move...
  8. dnlhlt I think I did alright with the opening, transposing it into something I'm more familiar with
  9. dnlhlt but then I struggled to convert it into an attack that doesn't in itself concede new vulnerabilities
  10. dnlhlt (this is, of course, an extreme example)
  11. bornacavrag Probably at some point h6 or g6 even if not optimal would have clarified into something less complex
  12. dnlhlt yeah
  13. dnlhlt I was slightly concerned about you sacrificing your bishop on h3 to end up with your queen relatively close to my then-unprotected king
  14. bornacavrag Yeah...
  15. dnlhlt I guess that's the thing, when the queen is on the h-file (or a-file if long castled) it's good to have "escape squares" in *both* direction
  16. dnlhlt *directions
  17. bornacavrag at the same time, I think you did well in the middle to keep the queen/knight occupied and out of the attack
  18. dnlhlt but this is good why I'm playing longer games against players a bit above my level
  19. bornacavrag i gotta brush up on the opening though, those 6 queen moves surely weren’t optimal
  20. dnlhlt Nd5 would've probably worked in a shorter game against an 1100 :P
  21. bornacavrag Not sure
  22. dnlhlt I mean, according to the engine transposing into a Caro-Kann was a mistake compared to accepting the gambit
  23. bornacavrag even in shorter control, it was induced by the pawn push, so you can assume the opponent sees it
  24. dnlhlt yeah, true
  25. bornacavrag For sure - the gambit is -1 according to the computer
  26. bornacavrag but it opens up the lines to attack on f6 with bishop, knight and queen so it’s extremely sharp
  27. dnlhlt which is what you can ask for with a gambit, tbh
  28. bornacavrag against a 2000 you’re just a pawn down for nothing, but I find it good to learn how to attack and play with tempo
  29. dnlhlt true
  30. bornacavrag Anyhow, gotta run, thanks for thegame
  31. dnlhlt you too!
  32. bornacavrag food luck in the next rounds