lichess.org
Donate
45:00
45:00
12345678abcdefgh
+0.3
SF 16 · 7MBNNUE
in local browser
1e4+0.3e5+0.12Nc3+0.1Nf6+0.13Bc40.0Nxe4+0.24Qh5+0.3Nd6+0.25Bb30.0Qf6??+3.9Blunder. Be7 was best.5...Be76.Qxe5O-O[...]6Nd5+3.7Qd8?!+4.9Inaccuracy. Qg6 was best.6...Qg67.Nxc7+Kd8[...]7Qxe5++6.6Be7+6.88Qxg7+6.3Rf8+6.59Nf3?!+4.7...Inaccuracy. Qe5 was best.9.Qe5f510.Nf3[...]9...c6+4.710Ne3+4.1Nb5?!+6.1Inaccuracy. Ne4 was best.10...Ne411.c411c4+6.0Nc7+5.712O-O+5.8d6+7.013Re1+6.8Ne6+6.914Qxh7+6.9Nd7+7.015Ng4?!+4.9...Inaccuracy. d4 was best.15.d4Nf616.Qc2[...]15...Nf6+5.016Nxf6++5.1Bxf6+5.017d4+5.0Rh8+5.118Qf5+4.3Be7?!+6.1Inaccuracy. Kf8 was best.18...Kf819.Qd3a5[...]19Qe4+5.4Bd7?!+8.9Inaccuracy. Kf8 was best.19...Kf820.d5cxd5[...]20Be3+6.3Qc7+8.521d5+8.0
1-0
Black resigned • White is victorious
Computer analysisMove timesCrosstableShare & export
FEN
[Event "Rated classical game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/qTD0OkUw"] [Date "2022.05.02"] [White "scvrf"] [Black "APDent42"] [Result "1-0"] [GameId "qTD0OkUw"] [UTCDate "2022.05.02"] [UTCTime "08:05:49"] [WhiteElo "1916"] [BlackElo "1923"] [WhiteRatingDiff "+16"] [BlackRatingDiff "-16"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "2700+45"] [ECO "C27"] [Opening "Vienna Game: Frankenstein-Dracula Variation"] [Termination "Normal"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1. e4 e5 2. Nc3 Nf6 3. Bc4 Nxe4 { C27 Vienna Game: Frankenstein-Dracula Variation } 4. Qh5 Nd6 5. Bb3 Qf6?? { (0.00 → 3.94) Blunder. Be7 was best. } (5... Be7 6. Qxe5 O-O 7. Nf3 Nc6 8. Qf4 Na5 9. O-O Nxb3 10. axb3) 6. Nd5 Qd8?! { (3.70 → 4.87) Inaccuracy. Qg6 was best. } (6... Qg6 7. Nxc7+ Kd8 8. Qxg6 hxg6 9. Nxa8 b6 10. Ne2 Bb7 11. Nxb6) 7. Qxe5+ Be7 8. Qxg7 Rf8 9. Nf3?! { (6.50 → 4.71) Inaccuracy. Qe5 was best. } (9. Qe5 f5 10. Nf3 c6 11. Qxe7+ Qxe7+ 12. Nxe7 Kxe7 13. O-O a5 14. Re1+ Kd8 15. a4 Na6) 9... c6 10. Ne3 Nb5?! { (4.14 → 6.09) Inaccuracy. Ne4 was best. } (10... Ne4 11. c4) 11. c4 Nc7 12. O-O d6 13. Re1 Ne6 14. Qxh7 Nd7 15. Ng4?! { (6.99 → 4.87) Inaccuracy. d4 was best. } (15. d4 Nf6 16. Qc2 Ng7 17. d5 Rh8 18. dxc6 bxc6 19. Ba4 Bd7 20. b4 Kf8 21. Bb2 Rh5) 15... Nf6 16. Nxf6+ Bxf6 17. d4 Rh8 18. Qf5 Be7?! { (4.25 → 6.11) Inaccuracy. Kf8 was best. } (18... Kf8 19. Qd3 a5 20. Bc2 d5 21. Be3 dxc4 22. Qxc4 Nc7 23. Bf4 Be6 24. Qc5+ Kg8 25. Be5) 19. Qe4 Bd7?! { (5.35 → 8.89) Inaccuracy. Kf8 was best. } (19... Kf8 20. d5 cxd5 21. cxd5 Ng7 22. Qf4 Nh5 23. Qe3 Bf6 24. Bd2 a5 25. Bc2 b5 26. Rab1) 20. Be3 Qc7 21. d5 { Black resigns. } 1-0
2 Inaccuracies
0 Mistakes
0 Blunders
51 Average centipawn loss
92%Accuracy
Learn from your mistakes
4 Inaccuracies
0 Mistakes
1 Blunder
84 Average centipawn loss
77%Accuracy
  1. mini_karpov what is this madness
  2. scvrf Haha well put karpov
  3. scvrf Yes this line is a bit tricky
  4. scvrf Basically Nc6 is forced
  5. APDent42 i am pretty sure that Nc6 instead of qf3 is just significantly better for me
  6. scvrf You will lose the exchange
  7. scvrf But have compensation
  8. scvrf Pretty balanced position
  9. scvrf The point is Nb5 after Nc6
  10. scvrf Oh wait, apparently the simple Be7 is the move.
  11. scvrf I haven't looked at that
  12. APDent42 i guess i have to look at this at some point
  13. APDent42 or just not take the pawn
  14. scvrf Yes
  15. scvrf Not taking the pawn is easier
  16. scvrf And simply play Nc6
  17. APDent42 but after Be7 it also looks pretty comfortable for black
  18. scvrf Tbh I have not looked at that
  19. scvrf You are right though
  20. APDent42 the knight on d6 is very annoying though
  21. scvrf Yes, and it can still get sharp
  22. scvrf The knight is misplaced and you're behind in development. Easy to go wrong
  23. APDent42 it really doesn't surprise me that qf6 leads to a +5.6 position
  24. APDent42 it felt exactly that bad
  25. scvrf I can imagine
  26. scvrf Basically you're losing two tempo
  27. scvrf And getting incredibly cramped
  28. APDent42 in an already underdeveloped position
  29. APDent42 that was quite bad by me
  30. scvrf Probably best to just give up the exchange at that point
  31. scvrf But its so difficult to do
  32. APDent42 do i actually get the knight back?
  33. scvrf I think so
  34. scvrf After Kd8, b6 Bb7
  35. scvrf But not sure
  36. scvrf I have very annoying Bd5 too
  37. APDent42 yes that was what i was looking at
  38. APDent42 you can also just sac on b6
  39. scvrf yes
  40. scvrf and I will be much better
  41. scvrf pretty hopeless position after Qf6
  42. APDent42 i preped for italian. I knew vienna was possible but i didn't want to do both
  43. scvrf Yeah I mainly play italian
  44. APDent42 at least it was pretty quick
  45. scvrf Tbh I'm not sure I'd play this if the match was tight
  46. scvrf Now I felt I had the room to experiment a bit
  47. APDent42 that is true
  48. scvrf I enjoy the Italian game more. But my coach is a big fan of the Vienna so wanted to give it a whirl
  49. APDent42 fair enough
  50. scvrf I think against the Vienna black can simply develop both knights then go after the light square bishop with Na5 and it will be an equal game
  51. APDent42 i think i just need to check for tactics more explicitly if i am in an opening i don't know
  52. APDent42 i only know the vienna gambit after Nf3
  53. APDent42 and there i know a little more
  54. APDent42 sorry nf6
  55. scvrf Ah with 3.f4
  56. APDent42 yes
  57. scvrf I never tried that one but black is supposed to be fine after 3... d5 I think
  58. APDent42 exactly
  59. APDent42 but there are a lot of complications
  60. scvrf Alright I'll gotta take off now. Thanks for the game, and hook me up if you want to practice Italian or some other e4/e5 systems any time!
  61. APDent42 thanks for the game. One day i will defeat you:)
  62. APDent42 will do
  63. scvrf Haha I'm sure! Take care!
1