- Blind mode tutorial
lichess.org
Donate

Lichess Antichess Game of the Month November — Contest

<Comment deleted by user>

@SirCumference-2 said in #22:

oh sorry didnt know
Don't worry, u still can submit another game if u want (but only rated)

@NagaKARTHIKChessM
Hmm, no offense but u posted a game where u didn't even win. And it's already from December, not November so it anyway won't be accepted

@Avi_Xav_2021 said in #27:

Check this out.
Same here, the game is from December, not November. Please always read the rules before posting something

@SirCumference-2 said in #22: > oh sorry didnt know Don't worry, u still can submit another game if u want (but only rated) @NagaKARTHIKChessM Hmm, no offense but u posted a game where u didn't even win. And it's already from December, not November so it anyway won't be accepted @Avi_Xav_2021 said in #27: > Check this out. Same here, the game is from December, not November. Please always read the rules before posting something

https://lichess.org/sL5WI5G5/black#1

https://lichess.org/sL5WI5G5/black#1

My two submissions for this month:

https://lichess.org/OT0079tP/black

https://lichess.org/oYtABgGv

Both are from my ACWC matches.

In the first game, I am proud of finding the win that none of the people spectating the match could find.
In the second game, 12.Nxe2 is such a beautiful move.

My two submissions for this month: https://lichess.org/OT0079tP/black https://lichess.org/oYtABgGv Both are from my ACWC matches. In the first game, I am proud of finding the win that none of the people spectating the match could find. In the second game, 12.Nxe2 is such a beautiful move.

Yeah, sure, not just a good game but even the best for an ANTICHESS contest. Guys, no offense but again, at least read the rules before posting

Yeah, sure, not just a good game but even the best for an ANTICHESS contest. Guys, no offense but again, at least read the rules before posting

Ok, let's try to analyze this game even though it's unrelated here. I'm not good at standard chess but I can say that 6. Bg5 is a blunder cause Black just takes the White knight with a check and leaves the White bishop undefended; exchanging the 1st rook with the bishop doesn't worth it; taking the pawn and losing the bishop is a blunder; exchanging queens and losing the 2nd rook is a blunder too (correct me if I'm wrong)

Ok, let's try to analyze this game even though it's unrelated here. I'm not good at standard chess but I can say that 6. Bg5 is a blunder cause Black just takes the White knight with a check and leaves the White bishop undefended; exchanging the 1st rook with the bishop doesn't worth it; taking the pawn and losing the bishop is a blunder; exchanging queens and losing the 2nd rook is a blunder too (correct me if I'm wrong)

Rochade is a blunder because its open the king
Don't supporting the pawns while the endgame is a blunder
Hitting the knight on e7 isn't necessary bc. the knight stand on e4 beatiful
Qg3 is a blunder bc. the rook is able to come on the second line
With WdIpH im going
(correct me also)

Rochade is a blunder because its open the king Don't supporting the pawns while the endgame is a blunder Hitting the knight on e7 isn't necessary bc. the knight stand on e4 beatiful Qg3 is a blunder bc. the rook is able to come on the second line With WdIpH im going (correct me also)

https://lichess.org/bA9c6DiG/white#49

https://lichess.org/bA9c6DiG/white#49

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.