OK, I don't get it, @RoadtoSGM ! The Chess dot com library is similar if not worse than the study interface. Here:
Opening the list of collections is akin to opening the list of studies in Lichess. Searching works the same way, only you have to press Enter and it's a grid in Lichess, not a list. The grid has more information than the list anyway.
Opening a study and opening a collection are also similar, but instead of just a searchable list, it's a complete study in Lichess. Clicking on a chapter is also like clicking on a collection game, since it opens the chapter in the same page.
I see collections have tags, which works the same as for Lichess study topics. Collections have one image that can be displayed and now that's possible for LiChess Tools users, too, with the study flairs.
The accordion embed thing is interesting, but I don't think is that useful in Lichess.
Searching is also buggy as hell in Chess dot com. You start filtering and it changes your sorting. It only searches in collection titles and game player names. Also implementing advanced searching in studies or chapters on Lichess is not possible for me since there is no good API for it.
So I don't get it. What exactly is so wonderful about that interface compared with the Lichess one?
OK, I don't get it, @RoadtoSGM ! The Chess dot com library is similar if not worse than the study interface. Here:
Opening the list of collections is akin to opening the list of studies in Lichess. Searching works the same way, only you have to press Enter and it's a grid in Lichess, not a list. The grid has more information than the list anyway.
Opening a study and opening a collection are also similar, but instead of just a searchable list, it's a complete study in Lichess. Clicking on a chapter is also like clicking on a collection game, since it opens the chapter in the same page.
I see collections have tags, which works the same as for Lichess study topics. Collections have one image that can be displayed and now that's possible for LiChess Tools users, too, with the study flairs.
The accordion embed thing is interesting, but I don't think is that useful in Lichess.
Searching is also buggy as hell in Chess dot com. You start filtering and it changes your sorting. It only searches in collection titles and game player names. Also implementing advanced searching in studies or chapters on Lichess is not possible for me since there is no good API for it.
So I don't get it. What exactly is so wonderful about that interface compared with the Lichess one?