| Community Blog Discussions - Openings vs. Ratings#31 @Aighearach said in #19: > Correct. You said nothing, though. > > Only resort to, "Gosh, people who I didn't understand probably didn't know what the words mean" after exhausting all other potential e… | loggeek ![]() |
| Community Blog Discussions - Openings vs. Ratings#15 @Aighearach said in #13: > The London is one of the top theoretical openings, if people find it "contemptible" perhaps you're from a different timeline? "Contemptible" means that people dislike it, an… | loggeek ![]() |
| Community Blog Discussions - Chessguessr.com#13 Very cool! Got the daily on the first try. I agree that there should be a way to play at least the previous dailies. | loggeek ![]() |
| Lichess Feedback - Improvement of the automatic analysis annotations#11 @Akbar2thegreat said in #10: > @loggeek > You aren't getting what I mean. > According to your logic, > If a move leads to more than -300 evaluation, then it's blunder but if a move leads to more than … | loggeek ![]() |
| Lichess Feedback - Improvement of the automatic analysis annotations#9 @Akbar2thegreat said in #8: > Something seems wrong here! The negative CP means if the eval is losing (-3, -5, -7) here. The greater than operators symbolize that. | loggeek ![]() |
| Lichess Feedback - Improvement of the automatic analysis annotations#6 The main point was about the bad moves (?! ? ??), but maybe an AI could be used to mark special moves. | loggeek ![]() |
| Lichess Feedback - Improvement of the automatic analysis annotations#3 @scarpentus said in #2: > So it would be a great move if you recaptured a queen, for example? > > I hope Lichess will stick to its current automated labeling for inaccuracies, etc, but stay away from … | loggeek ![]() |
| Lichess Feedback - Improvement of the automatic analysis annotations#1 Hi, I have an idea for improving the automatic analysis annotations. Could you provide feedback? (I'm planning to open an issue on GitHub about this, but i'm waiting for insight first). - Let `diff` a… | loggeek ![]() |
| General Chess Discussion - Hackers Leak Lichess Source Code#141 funny | loggeek ![]() |
| Lichess Feedback - Page d'entrainement : Roque validé alors que la tour interdit le roque.#2 Le roque est ici légal, car le roi ne passe pas par un échec. La tour a le droit de passer par un échec. | loggeek ![]() |
| Next |
|---|
