Search "user:Jobcreator"

@Sarg0n It appears this all started because I was not clear on the exact rules of pre-moves. Obviously, I wasn't aware that there was no distinction made between pre-moves and my apparently fictional …

@Rrhyddhad - I certainly knew it was possible and would have absolutely captured on d7 with bishop if the pre-capture move wasn't selected. I won the game - I'm not sour about the outcome. The fact is…

I hope I'm not making this up, haha! I think of a pre-move as any move pre-selected during your opponent's turn that would occupy an empty square. For example, a fianchetto. Pre-moves have rules. If t…

Aha! Well, now that's good information. No distinction between occupying and capturing. I can see how it works just the same as distinguishing. Does that, however, lay to rest the argument that a pre-…

@Sarg0n can you provide any insight into pre-moves becoming pre-captures in any circumstance - keeping my premise of distinguishing between pre-moves and pre-captures in mind?

@Sarg0n I had a free queen and ended up having to trade mine for it instead.

@Toadofsky - Yes. I pre-captured queen with queen on d4. Instead they moved Qd7, resulting in my questionable Qd4 move to counter. @MessyAnswer I feel like you're blending "pre-move" and "pre-capture"…

Hello - I'd like to revisit a topic I found archived after having experienced the same outcome as discussed before. Please see the study I created surrounding this event. https://lichess.org/study/nvV…