| Community Blog Discussions - Worst Day Ever#5 Absolute GENIUS. Love it. | ChessMathNerd |
| Lichess Feedback - Puzzle storm number miscount#5 @The_Daethalus I finish every run of puzzle storm that I start. My goal is not a new record at the current time. Also, FWI, it happened again today, if you look at my profile. | ChessMathNerd |
| Lichess Feedback - Puzzle storm number miscount#3 @Cedur216 I thought about that. The problem is that it doesn't have 1 played yesterday, which it would if that was the issue. | ChessMathNerd |
| Lichess Feedback - Puzzle storm number miscount#1 Hello everyone! Just wanted to bring a rather strange thing to your attention. So, if you look at my account, you can see that I have played 9 rounds of puzzle storm today and on the 25th. The problem… | ChessMathNerd |
| General Chess Discussion - What is lag switching?#22 Ok. I didn't know about lag switching. that explains why I sometimes lose games against 2100 ultra players who get down to .8 seconds and then never lose time despite me checking them over and over ag… | ChessMathNerd |
| Lichess Feedback - Four-Check#12 @TheKingClash Yeah I agree. The thing is though, that if white knows how to play correctly, black is hopelessly lost no matter what he plays. Within 5-10 moves in most lines, he reaches a miserable po… | ChessMathNerd |
| Lichess Feedback - Four-Check#8 @Chess_Poems I tried to make a three-check study, but to be truly comprehensive, it has to be split into about 20 different studies. There are just too many critical lines for both sides, where only o… | ChessMathNerd |
| Lichess Feedback - Four-Check#7 @RealDavidNavara I am no GM, and despite my not so great three-check rating, I will venture a few thoughts. I haven't played a lot of three-check but I know a great deal of opening theory, and yes, yo… | ChessMathNerd |
| Off-Topic Discussion - Hard Riddle #7#26 @TakeThePawnOrLose @CalbernandHowbe has an incorrect solution because there could be good pennies in the bad package. It doesn't say they are all bad. | ChessMathNerd |
| Off-Topic Discussion - Hard Riddle #7#22 @polylogarithmique Max would then be 17, 17, 16 -> 6, 6, 5 -> 2, 2, 2 -> 1 = 8 weighings. I don't think this is optimal but it is one way to do it. | ChessMathNerd |
| Next |
|---|