How about posting some analysis of your games as the forum suggests? Your thought processes in selecting your moves in critical positions would help players seeking to advance.
My thought process is completely random that’s all what I can say. At least I cannot describe it. But this applies to not few good players. Remember that Kramnik video?
I give sometimes hints on critical points (e.g. 20.Nf6!? in #5) or links to earlier postings where I wrote on-topic (#10). Moreover, everyone is invited to think himself which is by far the best training if one wants to.
The primary goal of this thread is too show some nice and cool games, to entertain and to boast of course.
Stay tuned!
I give sometimes hints on critical points (e.g. 20.Nf6!? in #5) or links to earlier postings where I wrote on-topic (#10). Moreover, everyone is invited to think himself which is by far the best training if one wants to.
The primary goal of this thread is too show some nice and cool games, to entertain and to boast of course.
Stay tuned!
I enjoyed clicking through @Sarg0n's selected games- thanks for sharing!
@mdinnerspace don't know if you've seen it, but maybe you'd prefer my approach? lichess.org/forum/game-analysis/over-the-board-games---2017-18-season
Horses for courses I guess...!
@mdinnerspace don't know if you've seen it, but maybe you'd prefer my approach? lichess.org/forum/game-analysis/over-the-board-games---2017-18-season
Horses for courses I guess...!
Hmmm.... what if everybody created a thread posting their games?
Nothing much too complain about as so few do.
It is easy enough and readily available the opportunity to follow any players games by simply clicking on their username.
I thought the analysis forum is a good place to share just that; analysis of a TN, difficult positions, SF vs human choices etc. with the players giving possible alternative moves and continuations.
Sargon stated he finds it impossible to share his thoughts as they are just too "random". He enjoys the "boasting". I might too but my brilliant masterpieces are few and far between :-)
Nothing much too complain about as so few do.
It is easy enough and readily available the opportunity to follow any players games by simply clicking on their username.
I thought the analysis forum is a good place to share just that; analysis of a TN, difficult positions, SF vs human choices etc. with the players giving possible alternative moves and continuations.
Sargon stated he finds it impossible to share his thoughts as they are just too "random". He enjoys the "boasting". I might too but my brilliant masterpieces are few and far between :-)
I played a couple of games but most of them were nothing special. Run of the mill resp. trying new things out. Everyone can have a look but I don‘t go into details.
Now one that I liked: besides Sicilian and Caro-Kann I returned to Modern Tiger which is pretty complicated usually. White was pressing hard so I had to react cautiously. The piece sac doesn’t work probably but Black was already a bit better. I was astonished that the error values were pretty low, 3/0/0, ACPL 19, so I was pleased. :)
Noteworthy: 1. ... g6?! is considered dubious. Well then...
Now one that I liked: besides Sicilian and Caro-Kann I returned to Modern Tiger which is pretty complicated usually. White was pressing hard so I had to react cautiously. The piece sac doesn’t work probably but Black was already a bit better. I was astonished that the error values were pretty low, 3/0/0, ACPL 19, so I was pleased. :)
Noteworthy: 1. ... g6?! is considered dubious. Well then...
This 1...g6 is not as bad as Stockfish thinks. I dislike 6 a4, but found to my surprise that it had been played in master games before.
I used to play ...g7-g6 in combination with c6 in my early years now returning as a "Modern Tiger" rather with a6. :) And the KID as well!
Another nice one on-topic "g6" to finish: 19. ... Na2 & and 20. ... Qb3 were bomb shells. White shoulda taken the Nb4...
Noteworthy: After seeing my first game Stockfish is convinced; it's not marked as an inaccuracy anymore! :D
Noteworthy: After seeing my first game Stockfish is convinced; it's not marked as an inaccuracy anymore! :D
Nice games CM @Sarg0n !
Modern Tiger
Is that like playing Golf on steroids?
Is that like playing Golf on steroids?
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.