I am empathetic towards women who have experienced harassment or sexist actions/remarks against them, whether that's over the Wild West of the Internet or OTB tournaments or clubs. I see that women have been encouraged away from chess in past years in favor of more housework or something more "girly" (is chess really more manly than other games that women stereotypically play? Bridge? Checkers? Anything?), and I am also interested in how "matter-of-factly" that the VP of FIDE and others present biological essentialism.
However, there is unfortunately a lack of a tangible solution in the article, as well researched and written as it is. What could I be doing as a male chess player to help any more than I already do? I treat female players the same as male players (and at risk of bringing any hot topics any further than they already have, I assume a female that has made it to my level has probably put in extra work to get there, so I feel like it would be a tougher game) and I have yet to act "casually sexist" in any way, or even in thought.
I am sympathetic to both the women that feel pushed out or preyed on in the chess community, and I am also sympathetic to the men who feel as though these articles serve little more than to insist that men are the villain of yet another hobby or community, so I would suppose that my forum reply only serves to ask for a more fleshed out solution.
If I am a male chess player, how do I better help women that feel as though they have unfair disadvantages? I feel as though the vast, vast majority of lichess male players are sympathetic towards the article and are fair to every opponent, male or female, so is there something extra that is called for? If the article serves little more than to complain for an essay's length, then I'd agree with some of the men that are frustrated over this article, but if there are real, tangible, attainable solutions that can be acted on by any guy or gal reading it, then I'd argue that the article serves a greater purpose towards bringing in more women (read: people in general) into chess, which I could hardly argue would be bad for anyone.
Hopefully this reply wasn't meaningless drivel.
However, there is unfortunately a lack of a tangible solution in the article, as well researched and written as it is. What could I be doing as a male chess player to help any more than I already do? I treat female players the same as male players (and at risk of bringing any hot topics any further than they already have, I assume a female that has made it to my level has probably put in extra work to get there, so I feel like it would be a tougher game) and I have yet to act "casually sexist" in any way, or even in thought.
I am sympathetic to both the women that feel pushed out or preyed on in the chess community, and I am also sympathetic to the men who feel as though these articles serve little more than to insist that men are the villain of yet another hobby or community, so I would suppose that my forum reply only serves to ask for a more fleshed out solution.
If I am a male chess player, how do I better help women that feel as though they have unfair disadvantages? I feel as though the vast, vast majority of lichess male players are sympathetic towards the article and are fair to every opponent, male or female, so is there something extra that is called for? If the article serves little more than to complain for an essay's length, then I'd agree with some of the men that are frustrated over this article, but if there are real, tangible, attainable solutions that can be acted on by any guy or gal reading it, then I'd argue that the article serves a greater purpose towards bringing in more women (read: people in general) into chess, which I could hardly argue would be bad for anyone.
Hopefully this reply wasn't meaningless drivel.