- Blind mode tutorial
lichess.org
Donate

Trade Chess

Hi people! If you are ever faced in a situation where both of your pieces (you and opponent) are exposed to one another, would you trade the material; for example: (queen, rook, bishop/knight)? I'm just asking because sometimes I try to hold my thought of trading because I feel like I'm better of with it... let me know your thoughts!

Hi people! If you are ever faced in a situation where both of your pieces (you and opponent) are exposed to one another, would you trade the material; for example: (queen, rook, bishop/knight)? I'm just asking because sometimes I try to hold my thought of trading because I feel like I'm better of with it... let me know your thoughts!

I think usually the goal is to try to get a little bit extra from the trade. For instance trading a minor piece for a minor piece and also getting a tempo, or worsening opponents pawn structure a little bit, or taking a well placed active piece with a less active one.
Then there are trades you just have to make for tactical reasons.
And trades in openings which you make or not depending on which line you prefer.

I think usually the goal is to try to get a little bit extra from the trade. For instance trading a minor piece for a minor piece and also getting a tempo, or worsening opponents pawn structure a little bit, or taking a well placed active piece with a less active one. Then there are trades you just have to make for tactical reasons. And trades in openings which you make or not depending on which line you prefer.

@norla said in #2:

I think usually the goal is to try to get a little bit extra from the trade. For instance trading a minor piece for a minor piece and also getting a tempo, or worsening opponents pawn structure a little bit, or taking a well placed active piece with a less active one.
Then there are trades you just have to make for tactical reasons.
And trades in openings which you make or not depending on which line you prefer.

My favorite trades are when my opp. has castled and I expose their king by taking a knight/bishop in the corner with mine, and I force them to double their pawns.

If there aren't a lot of pieces on the board and I don't have an advantage, I try not to trade. If I'm down I avoid trades at almost all costs. However, if my opp. proposes a trade that can loosen the "tension," (I don't know what to call it), then I'll accept it.

For example, if they have a good position with their queen and rooks on the four middle files, I'll trade the queens to mess up their attack.

@norla said in #2: > I think usually the goal is to try to get a little bit extra from the trade. For instance trading a minor piece for a minor piece and also getting a tempo, or worsening opponents pawn structure a little bit, or taking a well placed active piece with a less active one. > Then there are trades you just have to make for tactical reasons. > And trades in openings which you make or not depending on which line you prefer. My favorite trades are when my opp. has castled and I expose their king by taking a knight/bishop in the corner with mine, and I force them to double their pawns. If there aren't a lot of pieces on the board and I don't have an advantage, I try not to trade. If I'm down I avoid trades at almost all costs. However, if my opp. proposes a trade that can loosen the "tension," (I don't know what to call it), then I'll accept it. For example, if they have a good position with their queen and rooks on the four middle files, I'll trade the queens to mess up their attack.

@TipsChess_Official said in #1:

Hi people! If you are ever faced in a situation where both of your pieces (you and opponent) are exposed to one another, would you trade the material; for example: (queen, rook, bishop/knight)? I'm just asking because sometimes I try to hold my thought of trading because I feel like I'm better of with it... let me know your thoughts!
I try to trade when:

  1. Trade is part of the plan (distraction, for example)
  2. It gives some advantages or benefits for me (pone structure of opponent is damaged, I gain a tempo, etc.)
  3. To trade is better than not to trade (the opponent forced a change)
  4. When I have a material advantage
  5. When I want to simplify position.
    Also it's useful to trade if your opponent has space advantage.
@TipsChess_Official said in #1: > Hi people! If you are ever faced in a situation where both of your pieces (you and opponent) are exposed to one another, would you trade the material; for example: (queen, rook, bishop/knight)? I'm just asking because sometimes I try to hold my thought of trading because I feel like I'm better of with it... let me know your thoughts! I try to trade when: 1) Trade is part of the plan (distraction, for example) 2) It gives some advantages or benefits for me (pone structure of opponent is damaged, I gain a tempo, etc.) 3) To trade is better than not to trade (the opponent forced a change) 4) When I have a material advantage 5) When I want to simplify position. Also it's useful to trade if your opponent has space advantage.

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.