Engined don't count the sheer material but take also positional considerations into account. We all know that.
For 40 years ago we have had something like 1 pawn is something close to +1 depending on the positional factors. The last couple of years this evaluations have skyrocketed. Why`?
Engines calculate very deep and therefore assess the winning properties very high, there is almost hardly any connection to the material involved if there is a winning position.
Maybe a total switch to winning probabilities is the better way? Like AlphaZero does? A paradigm shift.
For 40 years ago we have had something like 1 pawn is something close to +1 depending on the positional factors. The last couple of years this evaluations have skyrocketed. Why`?
Engines calculate very deep and therefore assess the winning properties very high, there is almost hardly any connection to the material involved if there is a winning position.
Maybe a total switch to winning probabilities is the better way? Like AlphaZero does? A paradigm shift.