Was World War 2 necessary? (Like Americans joining the war?)

@natbee56 said ^

America joined the war because Japan attacked America
It was out of self defence
I am not American but I learned about the pearl harbour attack

@Rage698 said ^

World War 2 was not necessary, we should not blame Germany completely,obviously, the genocide is bad, sorry, my friends from Israel, but the war was actually caused by Britain, let me tell you how
Firstly, Britain could have invaded north Germany Hamburg in 1939, and then steam roll Germany to Berlin.
2nd mistake, 1940, the British empire had a full capabilities, to destroy the German Navy, especially the submarines, if they had given more funding to Turing in the 30ths , then they could have invaded , north Germany,
The biggest mistake, genocide, some people thought Britain was good, but the Bengal famine caused in India was completely preventable. And was done artificially by the British.
The bankruptcy of Britain was deserved, a peace treaty in 1940 was possible, it was that bulldog Winston Churchill, who refuse to surrender due to his ego, or if British people want to die so much, then they should have let us go free, why should India and other countries suffer for your war. That is why Subhas Chandra Bose was right, that is why that so called facist puppet, is held as a hero.

If America hadn’t funded Britain, the War would end before the Soviet Union, no American and no Soviets would die because of a British war

I said it is ethical, to have pushed Britain under the bus, as the lives of millions of Indians, Africans, Americans, and Russians, are more valuable than a mere British empire.

And. Thousandsof brits also.

"Fascism is the logical consequence of capitalism."

• No. Both in Italy and in Germany fascism resulted from socialism. Mussolini was a socialist at first.
  The National Socialist German Workers' Party has Socialist and Workers in its title.
  Hitler won the elections from the socialists and the communists because of the nationalist part: 'I will make Germany great again.'

@tpr said ^

"Fascism is the logical consequence of capitalism."

• No. Both in Italy and in Germany fascism resulted from socialism. Mussolini was a socialist at first.
  The National Socialist German Workers' Party has Socialist and Workers in its title.
  Hitler won the elections from the socialists and the communists because of the nationalist part: 'I will make Germany great again.'

It is, it always was
Capitalism caused hyperinflation in Germany and Italy,
If the French and British, did not take a ridiculous amount of money, currency is an integral part of capitalism. Then the moustache man would have never rose.
Socialism, does not always mean communism and leftism
It is derived from two words social ism
The original meaning of Nazism, was to bring nationalism, to the social public, who were riled up, this was the perfect opportunity for hitler to step up, his brilliant speeches, alongside his experience, from being a veteran, gave him the goons, he needed for the Bavaria March, which was the end for a democratic Germany, as it made hitler even more popular.

And the logic of capitalism, made the colonial countries exploit colonised countries, which made the war, even bigger, as Britain, France and Japan would not let go of them, if they were no large Corporations, what is the use of a bunch of people and resources, who are rebelling?

Hence, this was a British war and German war at the same time, so the PR team from 85 years ago, an Indian, proved you completely wrong,, although it was too late, if anybody wants to argue, oppose, or assist me, you are free to do.

Adolf Hitler :) hehe

"the Bavaria March"

• The 1923 beer hall putsch was a failure, that got Hitler jailed.
  He won the 1933 elections with his nationalistic pitch.

"Britain, France and Japan would not let go of them"

• Germany was stripped of its colonies and of territories by the Versailles Treaty.
  Japan conquered territory in Asia to get raw materials: oil, rubber, ore...

The Americans stayed neutral while others are brawling, so after a while everyone is tired and two of the others are in a not-so-great relation. Then when Japan attacked USA it finally joins in and it's not bruised yet like others. Then USA gets a spot in the war, a good spot.

Now look at China. Staying neutral (at least to others than USA) while Israel and others take sides. Who will end up bruised and who will end up perfectly ok?