@Wasted_Youth said in #10:
No way off topic; which themes did I introduce which have nothing to do with your thesis?
What are you trying to tell us - that the Chinese invented, perfected and have a monopoly on the understanding of the concept of a waiting move? Karpov was the master in this field, and I don ́t believe he had Chinese genes.
Strawman argument.
@Wasted_Youth said in #10:
> No way off topic; which themes did I introduce which have nothing to do with your thesis?
>
> What are you trying to tell us - that the Chinese invented, perfected and have a monopoly on the understanding of the concept of a waiting move? Karpov was the master in this field, and I don ́t believe he had Chinese genes.
Strawman argument.
Ok, forget it. Great thread.
Ok, forget it. Great thread.
@Wasted_Youth said in #10:
No way off topic; which themes did I introduce which have nothing to do with your thesis?
What are you trying to tell us - that the Chinese invented, perfected and have a monopoly on the understanding of the concept of a waiting move? Karpov was the master in this field, and I don ́t believe he had Chinese genes.
Anyone can apply any type of philosophy to their own life. You don't need to be born Christian to believe in Christianity. And, to your previous posts, who specifically said this philosophy is exclusive to the Chinese? Look at the Chinese in the world, not the game of Chess, they're a global superpower as well. The Chinese may be lacking in the Chess aspect of things, but in the world, they are one of those at the top of the world.
@Wasted_Youth said in #10:
> No way off topic; which themes did I introduce which have nothing to do with your thesis?
>
> What are you trying to tell us - that the Chinese invented, perfected and have a monopoly on the understanding of the concept of a waiting move? Karpov was the master in this field, and I don ́t believe he had Chinese genes.
Anyone can apply any type of philosophy to their own life. You don't need to be born Christian to believe in Christianity. And, to your previous posts, who specifically said this philosophy is exclusive to the Chinese? Look at the Chinese in the world, not the game of Chess, they're a global superpower as well. The Chinese may be lacking in the Chess aspect of things, but in the world, they are one of those at the top of the world.
Develop and improve your position while your opponent is quiet, but attack yourself a move before your opponent has the chance to attack.
Wait that actually makes a lot of sense. I need to start down my that in my games. Thank you, Chinese philosophy.
Develop and improve your position while your opponent is quiet, but attack yourself a move before your opponent has the chance to attack.
Wait that actually makes a lot of sense. I need to start down my that in my games. Thank you, Chinese philosophy.
@keisanki said in #11:
Strawman argument.
uh-oh...Critical Thinking
@keisanki said in #11:
> Strawman argument.
uh-oh...Critical Thinking
@SirSpud525 said in #14:
Develop and improve your position while your opponent is quiet, but attack yourself a move before your opponent has the chance to attack.
Wait that actually makes a lot of sense. I need to start down my that in my games. Thank you, Chinese philosophy.
@matt3010
@SirSpud525 said in #14:
> Develop and improve your position while your opponent is quiet, but attack yourself a move before your opponent has the chance to attack.
>
> Wait that actually makes a lot of sense. I need to start down my that in my games. Thank you, Chinese philosophy.
@matt3010
It reminds me of the time when I offered a Queen exchange to my opponent, but then they moved a piece other than their Queen.
Now, I don't want to exchange my Queen.
It reminds me of the time when I offered a Queen exchange to my opponent, but then they moved a piece other than their Queen.
Now, I don't want to exchange my Queen.
Read your enemy first and one step ahead
Read your enemy first and one step ahead
@SirSpud525 @keisanki Thank you