- Blind mode tutorial
lichess.org
Donate

The legendary match between 2 engines.

time control: 240+0 1 CPU
Black: Fire 5 elo 3272
White: Stock 8 elo 3391

https://en.lichess.org/pog80uBt#1

online analysis shows no inaccuracies nor mistakes, the only difference is 1 average centipawn loss
And i just can't understand how they saw the slightest difference to win

time control: 240+0 1 CPU Black: Fire 5 elo 3272 White: Stock 8 elo 3391 https://en.lichess.org/pog80uBt#1 online analysis shows no inaccuracies nor mistakes, the only difference is 1 average centipawn loss And i just can't understand how they saw the slightest difference to win

But white is totally winning in the end. The analysis stopped before, I assume.

But white is totally winning in the end. The analysis stopped before, I assume.

They played 240 min + 0 s/move, so I presume they played the last part in mutual time trouble.

They played 240 min + 0 s/move, so I presume they played the last part in mutual time trouble.

I wonder if Stockfish is just better at time management that its counterpart.

I wonder if Stockfish is just better at time management that its counterpart.

I wonder if Stockfish is just better at time management than its counterpart.

I wonder if Stockfish is just better at time management than its counterpart.

Lol, 100 moves of just moving back and forth. I have no idea why people admire these stupid machines.

Lol, 100 moves of just moving back and forth. I have no idea why people admire these stupid machines.

They should play with increment, now the second part of the game looks af it were a bullet game.

They should play with increment, now the second part of the game looks af it were a bullet game.

wtf they are so weak, tell them to lear n chesss!!11!

wtf they are so weak, tell them to lear n chesss!!11!

Can someone knowledgeable about QGD criticize the move 4...a6 in that line? It seems to yield good results in a small portion of master games. Has it been refuted and that's why it is not more popular?

Can someone knowledgeable about QGD criticize the move 4...a6 in that line? It seems to yield good results in a small portion of master games. Has it been refuted and that's why it is not more popular?

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.