AM i too stupid ( unfocused) when I HAVE TO play faster.....? YES !
https://lichess.org/study/KDxklldt
AM i too stupid ( unfocused) when I HAVE TO play faster.....? YES !
https://lichess.org/study/KDxklldt
AM i too stupid ( unfocused) when I HAVE TO play faster.....? YES !
Play with increment.
KI says:
'Average centipawn loss
101 or greater: Horrific
76-100: Dreadful
61-75: Bad
51-60: OK
41-50: Good
31-40: Excellent
21-30: Outstanding (average for a GM)
11-20: Nearly perfect (average for a GM on a good day)'.
so with 9 i'm not on that list because too good but i loose and loose. i don't understand chess.
Losing on time has nothing to do with average centipawn loss.
@diMENSIO_inFINITUS said in #6:
it should ...otherwise the centipawn loss means nothing...
I don't understand what u mean, centipawn loss is how well u played according to stockfish, and centipawn loss was never a good way to tell If u played well or not. If you get to a completely drawn endgame that's ez and play the whole thing, your centipawn loss will be low as the whole endgame u did not play a bad move. Time has no relation to centipawn loss, and it makes no sense for it to. Centipawn is 1/100th of a pawn, so when the evaluation goes down 0.01 after u move, u lost a centipawn. This has no relation to time. Also some tournaments have increment, and if it doesn't just don't play tournaments, no reason to unless u want to chat or u want to get into top ranks.
ps: thanks for your swift clarification effort though...
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.