@DrunkSmellyHomeless Guess your an idiot then and You literally played a perfect game against stockfish and your like 1900 lichess rating its hard for magnus carlsen to do that.
@DrunkSmellyHomeless Guess your an idiot then and You literally played a perfect game against stockfish and your like 1900 lichess rating its hard for magnus carlsen to do that.
@ChessFriend2010 Ok man believe what you want to believe.
@ChessFriend2010 Ok man believe what you want to believe.
@DrunkSmellyHomeless Ok got it ;) BUT REMEMBER ThErEs No RiGhT Or WrOnG
@DrunkSmellyHomeless Ok got it ;) BUT REMEMBER ThErEs No RiGhT Or WrOnG
@ChessFriend2010 I know i got 6 average centipawn loss, but the computer also got 12, instead of 4 so I don't know...
@ChessFriend2010 I know i got 6 average centipawn loss, but the computer also got 12, instead of 4 so I don't know...
@greataverythepro Yeah thats weird but okay
@greataverythepro Yeah thats weird but okay
It's possible to achieve low cpl against computer if it is not a super tactical game. Exchange after exchange and a bit endgame. You exchange your pieces early.
That stockfish game did not seem like super tactical, it was a simple game.
It's possible to achieve low cpl against computer if it is not a super tactical game. Exchange after exchange and a bit endgame. You exchange your pieces early.
That stockfish game did not seem like super tactical, it was a simple game.
@GoodELO Exactly, non of my moves were super crazy. It was a rather boring game, I admit the cpl was insanely low but it was luck...
@GoodELO Exactly, non of my moves were super crazy. It was a rather boring game, I admit the cpl was insanely low but it was luck...