<Comment deleted by user>
It makes sense as you're giving up a queen and bishop for a queen and rook, and that's winning material, I don't see anything "unnatural" about it
It makes sense as you're giving up a queen and bishop for a queen and rook, and that's winning material, I don't see anything "unnatural" about it
Capturing the rook on f1 is the only way for black to win a piece. Moving the queen anywhere will result in a devastating loss for black. I hope this explains it.
Capturing the rook on f1 is the only way for black to win a piece. Moving the queen anywhere will result in a devastating loss for black. I hope this explains it.
It doesn't have a discovered attack tag. But that is the point of the tactic.
We sacrifice our queen to attract the opponent's king onto a square where there's a discovered attack on the opponent's queen.
It doesn't have a discovered attack tag. But that is the point of the tactic.
We sacrifice our queen to attract the opponent's king onto a square where there's a discovered attack on the opponent's queen.
I see it now, thank you very much guys, i was blind not even thinking | seeing in our own rook at a8.
I see it now, thank you very much guys, i was blind not even thinking | seeing in our own rook at a8.
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.
