now before I would make claims, I'm going to compare two profiles in lichess where I have 1500 blitzs and 1900 rapid
(both are constantly falling) so
I'm in this userbase average at blitzs and around better than 87% of lichess playerbase
www.chess.com/stats/live/blitz/xdamkiller
on chess.com, I'm around 1300-1400 at blizs (top 8%) and 1700 rapid (top 1.6%) (the diffrence between chess.com and lichess elo are getting close)
meaning average lichess blizs player is around 1400 at chess.com
what I think is accually going on, is here not enough supply on new players. meaning that general strength playerbase increases. meaning it is only going to be harder to get elo and super easy to lose elo. and here must be a update for "skill representation". After all, my chess.com elo is very stable but lichess is not.
(both are constantly falling) so
I'm in this userbase average at blitzs and around better than 87% of lichess playerbase
www.chess.com/stats/live/blitz/xdamkiller
on chess.com, I'm around 1300-1400 at blizs (top 8%) and 1700 rapid (top 1.6%) (the diffrence between chess.com and lichess elo are getting close)
meaning average lichess blizs player is around 1400 at chess.com
what I think is accually going on, is here not enough supply on new players. meaning that general strength playerbase increases. meaning it is only going to be harder to get elo and super easy to lose elo. and here must be a update for "skill representation". After all, my chess.com elo is very stable but lichess is not.