@DrMsBoss said in #50:
That goes back to the whole I am super dismissive thing and I don't even leave people room to argue with me thing.
I'm like that 100% of the time. Not even in a smug or haughty way, just can't be asked.
You're not dismissive , you're argumentative.
@DrMsBoss said in #50:
> That goes back to the whole I am super dismissive thing and I don't even leave people room to argue with me thing.
>
> I'm like that 100% of the time. Not even in a smug or haughty way, just can't be asked.
You're not dismissive , you're argumentative.
@Buttercup22 said in #51:
You're not dismissive , you're argumentative.
An argumentative person would have been oppositional and given a counter argument, fought over context, ideas and facts.
A dismissive person like me doesn't even acknowledge the things an argumentative person would have to address, argue over and gain / cede ground about.
An argumentative person would also be more theater than actually arguing in this case, because it would be hard to argue with someone who totally agrees with everything I said.
@Buttercup22 said in #51:
> You're not dismissive , you're argumentative.
An argumentative person would have been oppositional and given a counter argument, fought over context, ideas and facts.
A dismissive person like me doesn't even acknowledge the things an argumentative person would have to address, argue over and gain / cede ground about.
An argumentative person would also be more theater than actually arguing in this case, because it would be hard to argue with someone who totally agrees with everything I said.
@DrMsBoss said in #52:
An argumentative person would have been oppositional and given a counter argument, fought over context, ideas and facts.
No, that's a person who likes to debate. You like to ARGUE.
A dismissive person like me doesn't even acknowledge the things an argumentative person would have to address, argue over and gain / cede ground about.
This whole post is acknowledging the fact that I called you argumentative in my last post and disputing it. You just proved me right.
An argumentative person would also be more theater than actually arguing in this case, because it would be hard to argue with someone who totally agrees with everything I said.
Arguing is theatre, at least for some people like you.
@DrMsBoss said in #52:
> An argumentative person would have been oppositional and given a counter argument, fought over context, ideas and facts.
No, that's a person who likes to debate. You like to ARGUE.
> A dismissive person like me doesn't even acknowledge the things an argumentative person would have to address, argue over and gain / cede ground about.
This whole post is acknowledging the fact that I called you argumentative in my last post and disputing it. You just proved me right.
> An argumentative person would also be more theater than actually arguing in this case, because it would be hard to argue with someone who totally agrees with everything I said.
Arguing is theatre, at least for some people like you.
@Buttercup22
But do I actually like to argue, or are you just saying salty things because of the alpha vibes / defensive things I told you not to worry about earlier?
An argument, or a debate relies on a certain level of communication. If I just read between the lines, and not really pay attention to what you type so much as what you are telling / showing, then all of a sudden you completely agreed with me this entire time and are just coping with it in your own way.
But of course, by all means continue so long as you need to.
@Buttercup22
But do I actually like to argue, or are you just saying salty things because of the alpha vibes / defensive things I told you not to worry about earlier?
An argument, or a debate relies on a certain level of communication. If I just read between the lines, and not really pay attention to what you type so much as what you are telling / showing, then all of a sudden you completely agreed with me this entire time and are just coping with it in your own way.
But of course, by all means continue so long as you need to.
@Buttercup22 said in #30:
Sockpuppeting is a form of spam.
lichess.org/page/forum-etiquette
@Buttercup22 Why do you think @DrMsBoss is my sockpuppet?
The way she write is totally different from me).
Similar name may be 1. she is my fan or 2. just coincidece.
@Buttercup22 said in #30:
> Sockpuppeting is a form of spam.
> lichess.org/page/forum-etiquette
@Buttercup22 Why do you think @DrMsBoss is my sockpuppet?
The way she write is totally different from me).
Similar name may be 1. she is my fan or 2. just coincidece.
@drmrboss said in #55:
@Buttercup22 Why do you think @DrMsBoss is my sockpuppet?
The way she write is totally different from me).
Similar name may be 1. she is my fan or 2. just coincidece.
He doesn't actually think that. Let an outburst be itself, read between the lines. He'll cool off in a week or so.
@drmrboss said in #55:
> @Buttercup22 Why do you think @DrMsBoss is my sockpuppet?
>
> The way she write is totally different from me).
> Similar name may be 1. she is my fan or 2. just coincidece.
He doesn't actually think that. Let an outburst be itself, read between the lines. He'll cool off in a week or so.
@DrMsBoss said in #54:
But do I actually like to argue, or are you just saying salty things because of the alpha vibes / defensive things I told you not to worry about earlier?
I don't even give you the credit for liking to argue. I think it's more a function of your attention seeking behaviors.
An argument, or a debate relies on a certain level of communication. If I just read between the lines, and not really pay attention to what you type so much as what you are telling / showing, then all of a sudden you completely agreed with me this entire time and are just coping with it in your own way.
No, I was the one to make the distinction between arguing and debate. So you are agreeing with me.
But of course, by all means continue so long as you need to.
I don't need or care about your permission to continue, thank you.
@Buttercup22 Why do you think @DrMsBoss is my sockpuppet?
The way she write is totally different from me).
Similar name may be 1. she is my fan or 2. just coincidece.
This denial is too stupid to warrant responding to really but I can't help but saying your writing styles, both incoherent, confirm the sockpupet observation. T
He doesn't actually think that. Let an outburst be itself, read between the lines. He'll cool off in a week or so.
So sockpuppeting is not just not weird enough for you? Now you actually have to argue with yourself?
@DrMsBoss said in #54:
>But do I actually like to argue, or are you just saying salty things because of the alpha vibes / defensive things I told you not to worry about earlier?
I don't even give you the credit for liking to argue. I think it's more a function of your attention seeking behaviors.
>An argument, or a debate relies on a certain level of communication. If I just read between the lines, and not really pay attention to what you type so much as what you are telling / showing, then all of a sudden you completely agreed with me this entire time and are just coping with it in your own way.
No, I was the one to make the distinction between arguing and debate. So you are agreeing with me.
>But of course, by all means continue so long as you need to.
I don't need or care about your permission to continue, thank you.
>@Buttercup22 Why do you think @DrMsBoss is my sockpuppet?
The way she write is totally different from me).
Similar name may be 1. she is my fan or 2. just coincidece.
This denial is too stupid to warrant responding to really but I can't help but saying your writing styles, both incoherent, confirm the sockpupet observation. T
>He doesn't actually think that. Let an outburst be itself, read between the lines. He'll cool off in a week or so.
So sockpuppeting is not just not weird enough for you? Now you actually have to argue with yourself?
@Buttercup22 said in #57:
I don't even give you the credit for liking to argue. I think it's more a function of your attention seeking behaviors.
No, I was the one to make the distinction between arguing and debate. So you are agreeing with me.
I don't need or care about your permission to continue, thank you.
The way she write is totally different from me).
Similar name may be 1. she is my fan or 2. just coincidece.
This denial is too stupid to warrant responding to really but I can't help but saying your writing styles, both incoherent, confirm the sockpupet observation. T
So sockpuppeting is not just not weird enough for you? Now you actually have to argue with yourself?
You shouldn't be so paranoid about a forum. It is bad for your health and wellness.
@Buttercup22 said in #57:
> I don't even give you the credit for liking to argue. I think it's more a function of your attention seeking behaviors.
>
>
> No, I was the one to make the distinction between arguing and debate. So you are agreeing with me.
>
>
> I don't need or care about your permission to continue, thank you.
>
>
> The way she write is totally different from me).
> Similar name may be 1. she is my fan or 2. just coincidece.
> This denial is too stupid to warrant responding to really but I can't help but saying your writing styles, both incoherent, confirm the sockpupet observation. T
>
>
> So sockpuppeting is not just not weird enough for you? Now you actually have to argue with yourself?
You shouldn't be so paranoid about a forum. It is bad for your health and wellness.
@DrMsBoss said in #58:
You shouldn't be so paranoid about a forum. It is bad for your health and wellness.
Having multiple personalities isn't exactly the example of being well.
@DrMsBoss said in #58:
> You shouldn't be so paranoid about a forum. It is bad for your health and wellness.
Having multiple personalities isn't exactly the example of being well.
@Buttercup22 said in #59:
Having multiple personalities isn't exactly the example of being well.
Try working out, sound body = sound mind.
@Buttercup22 said in #59:
> Having multiple personalities isn't exactly the example of being well.
Try working out, sound body = sound mind.