@Sandy1966-05,I disagree with you! Mettspiel is my strong point, although I am not an experienced specialist.
The dude himself, you brute!
And besides, there are prodigies who do not need to be taught a chess technique, they create their own. Sometimes a beginner understands what a grandmaster does not understand!
@Art_124 said in #52:
> @Sandy1966-05,I disagree with you! Mettspiel is my strong point, although I am not an experienced specialist.
1) Well, as long as you registered just two weeks ago, your ratings (not impressive) may mean nothing. Can yoiu tell your FIDE ID or РШФ ID?
2) What, specifically, have you disagreed with me?
@Art_124 said in #54:
> And besides, there are prodigies who do not need to be taught a chess technique, they create their own. Sometimes a beginner understands what a grandmaster does not understand!
Wrong. Beginner just does not see what GM sees.
my fide rating in classic is 1609, in rapid is 1628 and in blitz is 1585
As near as I can tell, about 13 hours ago, this discussion crossed the 50 post limit and began to plunge into the depths. Apparently, contributions here will no longer cause the discussion to rise in the list.
@Sandy1966-05 yes, you are correct, beginners dont see what gms see
@Art_124 Sandy is not brute, sandy is right and you are wrong, that is my opinion (and it is correct opinion) and fact (i am telling advanced things)
@ColossusChess said in #36:
> This is not true. It all depends on the settings and database used.
>
> Below 2000 1...c6 is the best opening statistically against 1.e4. Over 2500 in blitz many openings do better statistically, even Scandinavian and Alekhine.
I saw the Sicilian being statistically best in a New In Chess database long back on a webpage. And I am just talking about that.
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.