Are unfair play detection monitored in casual play?

That's certainly why I have stopped playing casual games.

@pawgdawg69 said in #10:

But what is the reasoning the automated methods are not active? Would the feature be used more if they were?
there is limited amount of computer resources available hence better directed on rated play

@petri999 said in #12:

there is limited amount of computer resources available hence better directed on rated play

If this is the reason (do you know that this is the reason or do you guess?) it is unsatisfying.

Because, one, the decision that the resources are "better directed" is subjective and arbitrary, and two, we are talking about the possibility that not "directing the resources" actually decreases the demand for the resources. Continuing this argument implies that it is in the site interest to limit demand (number of games played, number of players) according with the available "resources". This is clearly not the site's philosophy.

(If you prefer, if "resources allocated" and demand are correlated, there is an intermediate value arugment to be made that implies the amount of resources should not be zero!)

Finally, there are basic things that are obviously "free" from the point of view of computing resources that are part of the system (for example, browser telemetry). How do you explain these being disabled, then?

I prefer playing unrated games to just chill and relax, but it is getting less and less pleasant to do so as cheating is becoming more and more and also the lack of netiquette is often a real problem when trying to just enjoy a friendly/casual game ...

@pawgdawg69 said in #13:

If this is the reason (do you know that this is the reason or do you guess?) it is unsatisfying.

Because, one, the decision that the resources are "better directed" is subjective and arbitrary, and two, we are talking about the possibility that not "directing the resources" actually decreases the demand for the resources. Continuing this argument implies that it is in the site interest to limit demand (number of games played, number of players) according with the available "resources". This is clearly not the site's philosophy.

(If you prefer, if "resources allocated" and demand are correlated, there is an intermediate value arugment to be made that implies the amount of resources should not be zero!)

Finally, there are basic things that are obviously "free" from the point of view of computing resources that are part of the system (for example, browser telemetry). How do you explain these being disabled, then?
Đó là một thật sự thú vị.

@outofthegame said in #14:

I prefer playing unrated games to just chill and relax, but it is getting less and less pleasant to do so as cheating is becoming more and more and also the lack of netiquette is often a real problem when trying to just enjoy a friendly/casual game ...

Uncertain that there is "cheating" actually going on. But matchmaking at level instead of random draw would be nice. If turned off "automated systems" causes this, I would like to ask for it to be there. When I play it feels more like playing very advanced humans than the computer.