@Ihavenothing #8 Actually a 1920 player vs. a 2400 player has about 0.1 in 10 chances of winning. It's about 0.06 in 10 chances of winning vs. a 2500 player.
-3.1415926
side point- Why don’t you play some games with people of similar ratings.Almost all of your opponents are below 1500 and either resigns under 20 moves or do not make a move at all.Playing with stronger opponents might give you a more representative rating so you can find students of the right level.Good luck!
side point- Why don’t you play some games with people of similar ratings.Almost all of your opponents are below 1500 and either resigns under 20 moves or do not make a move at all.Playing with stronger opponents might give you a more representative rating so you can find students of the right level.Good luck!
Here's a tip, folks: if you really do want to improve, don't turn to somebody who leads off with an idiot question right in the thread title.
Sometimes I draw or win against them (albeit rare), so I am 0.5/1 or 1/1 against them occasionally.
Oh yeah, and how good am I compared to a GM (on a 1-10 scale)? With any luck at all, I might rate a 1. ;)
I mostly play to a postion and I don't seee the write moves and I lose. So its 1 to 10
@Tae7 There's something vaguely circular in your answer....I can't put my finger on it because it keeps going around and around....
@clutchnutz even bigger than i thought, anyhow i ment i know 3/10 of what a 2400 player knows, but could win against a 1920 gm.
I second #22 #23 man up and stop farming noobs in your team before trying to get any students.Your rating is kinda inflated.....
No my rating is of a good chess player.
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.