chess.com analysis vs lichess analysis

@parsa00maleki077 said in #10:

I really like the report card new feature at chess.com too
What is a report card? I think I missed it.

@The_Fire_Of_Chess said in #11:

What is a report card? I think I missed it.

It characterizes your play by phase (opening, middlegame, and endgame) https://www.chess.com/news/view/chesscom-launches-game-review-v2#report-card lichess insights let's you see your accuracy by phase also, but it doesn't do it as part of a game's computer analysis.

Chess.com you have to pay for.

You can get the same information from both.

They are both good.

(I have proof why chess.com analysis (Premium mod) is better than lichess)

https://images.chesscomfiles.com/uploads/v1/images_users/tiny_mce/The_Arrow_Of_Requiem/phpfCv94e.png

In the first photo the move e4 which is Englund Gambit is considered a blunder. And then there is another move which is considered a blunder.

https://images.chesscomfiles.com/uploads/v1/images_users/tiny_mce/The_Arrow_Of_Requiem/php7SOQuN.png

This one considers this a blunder. I thought alright, fine I won’t play England gambit. Then I went to chess.com and replayed the moves here in the Analysis and saw Here, e4 is considered a Book Move

https://images.chesscomfiles.com/uploads/v1/images_users/tiny_mce/The_Arrow_Of_Requiem/php8DYoNe.png (Look)

And then the next move which lichess said blunder d5 is also a book move (go to next page to see more)