lichess.org
Donate

whst's your zodiac sign

You are absolutely correct.
Astrology is quite simple.
@Human77

There are literally thousands of ‘‘Future-predicters’’ in India here, who have *stolen* money from so many after brainwashing them.
@Mantram_PateL said in #34:
> @Human77
>
> There are literally thousands of ‘‘Future-predicters’’ in India here, who have *stolen* money from so many after brainwashing them.
I really believe in astrology and horoscopes.. it actually works! But most of them these days scam.. so more and more people don't believe in those things. I believe in those things cuz my grandmother believes and say now it's sani and coincidence, it will be a bad time..
Edit: Future predictor means fortune teller
@Pro_PrarthanaR_2009 said in #35:
> I think I am cancer. I just realized I am the cancer of lichess forums! What a coincidence!
But I am actually cancer! Not leo! But my birthday shows it is leo according to the list! How's that possible?!
@Human77 said in #30:
> To me Astrology is quite simple,
> either you understand it or you don't.

You seem to imply that I don't. Could you explain it to me in a way that I would understand then? Have I been talking past you by talking about western Astrology whereas you were talking about something else? Have I been making too many unjustified assumptions? If so, I'm sorry for the misunderstanding. Do I come off as overly presumptuous?

> If you don't, at least keep quiet about it.

Don't you remember specifically asking for the reason someone rejects astrology in #25? My post #27 was my attempt at explaining why I personally am not convinced of that particular brand of (western) astrology described therein and why I even consider it potentially harmful (it may be argued that it may have prevented Nancy Reagan from seeking actual therapy for her possible PTSD [I should say that I'm not a psychologist, so I cannot properly diagnose her, I can only speculate]).

You asked for someone's personal reasoning and I provided mine because I thought it to be relevant to the question you posed. Maybe it wasn't?

> The ramblings I just saw here has nothing to do with the Astrology I know,
> to clarify what I mean.

About the "ramblings" part: True, my posts were both lengthy. But they weren't inconsequential or confused (as far as I can tell).

Alright then, what is the astrology you know and it what ways does it differ from what I have described in my posts? Am I way off? Have I overlooked something? I'm actually genuinely curious to hear your opinion if you care to share it!
You obviously don't have to talk to me if you don't want to.

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.