@Human77 said in #30:
> To me Astrology is quite simple,
> either you understand it or you don't.
You seem to imply that I don't. Could you explain it to me in a way that I would understand then? Have I been talking past you by talking about western Astrology whereas you were talking about something else? Have I been making too many unjustified assumptions? If so, I'm sorry for the misunderstanding. Do I come off as overly presumptuous?
> If you don't, at least keep quiet about it.
Don't you remember specifically asking for the reason someone rejects astrology in #25? My post #27 was my attempt at explaining why I personally am not convinced of that particular brand of (western) astrology described therein and why I even consider it potentially harmful (it may be argued that it may have prevented Nancy Reagan from seeking actual therapy for her possible PTSD [I should say that I'm not a psychologist, so I cannot properly diagnose her, I can only speculate]).
You asked for someone's personal reasoning and I provided mine because I thought it to be relevant to the question you posed. Maybe it wasn't?
> The ramblings I just saw here has nothing to do with the Astrology I know,
> to clarify what I mean.
About the "ramblings" part: True, my posts were both lengthy. But they weren't inconsequential or confused (as far as I can tell).
Alright then, what is the astrology you know and it what ways does it differ from what I have described in my posts? Am I way off? Have I overlooked something? I'm actually genuinely curious to hear your opinion if you care to share it!
You obviously don't have to talk to me if you don't want to.