@igmo_fitzpatzer said in #40:
@Kelvin306 it is unethical to allow euthenasia for people with terminal illness
or
To make any law regarding suicide
or
corporations must pay patrons for being on hold
or
you pick
MB, lost my temper due to chess homework ps i choose you pick cause you listed it as a option
@igmo_fitzpatzer said in #40:
> @Kelvin306 it is unethical to allow euthenasia for people with terminal illness
> or
> To make any law regarding suicide
> or
> corporations must pay patrons for being on hold
> or
> you pick
MB, lost my temper due to chess homework ps i choose you pick cause you listed it as a option
Frankly have no idea what you mean
Frankly have no idea what you mean
@Kelvin306
we could have a debate right here if you'd like
rules, no insulting language, offensive slang, or use of ai to research
You?
@igmo_fitzpatzer said in #40:
@Kelvin306 it is unethical to allow euthenasia for people with terminal illness
or
To make any law regarding suicide
or
corporations must pay patrons for being on hold
or
you pick a debate topic
Me?
I'm sorry what was your question, Kel?
@Kelvin306
> we could have a debate right here if you'd like
>
> rules, no insulting language, offensive slang, or use of ai to *research*
You?
@igmo_fitzpatzer said in #40:
> @Kelvin306 it is unethical to allow euthenasia for people with terminal illness
> or
> To make any law regarding suicide
> or
> corporations must pay patrons for being on hold
> or
> you pick a debate topic
Me?
I'm sorry what was your question, Kel?
Okay, let's discuss whether it can be ethical to allow or disallow euthenasia. no debate. arguments for consideration only as this is a tough one.
@Kelvin306
Okay, let's discuss whether it can be ethical to allow or disallow euthenasia. no debate. arguments for consideration only as this is a tough one.
@Kelvin306
@igmo_fitzpatzer said in #43:
@Kelvin306
You?
Me?
I'm sorry what was your question, Kel?
IDK what your talking about, I think what you meant is that you and me have a debate but I meant it to the other guy.
@igmo_fitzpatzer said in #43:
> @Kelvin306
>
>
> You?
>
>
>
> Me?
>
> I'm sorry what was your question, Kel?
IDK what your talking about, I think what you meant is that you and me have a debate but I meant it to the other guy.
I'll happily do arguments with you though :)
I'll happily do arguments with you though :)
At my school even Islamic kids don’t care anymore...
At my school even Islamic kids don’t care anymore...
@Robert_G123456789 said in #25:
laughs
laughs
laughs
You say that brainrot should be removed because it is nonsense.
But, what you just posted is nonsense, too!
Think about it. You just said that it takes "a greed". That is not a valid phrase in any language on Earth and beyond. AND, yes, you just confirmed that I can draw them :))))))))))))))))))))))))).
'It takes a greed' by itself isn't a valid phrase, yes. But 'it just takes a greed for views to do something' etc. etc. could mean that all it takes to come up with an idiotic idea like that is the desire for views, NOT creativity, which is, in my opinion, true.
Also, do you not know what sarcasm is?
So, if you are going to delete brainrot, why don't you delete all your posts and your account?
They are comparable in the amount of nonsense that they have, although I'd say that the latter is more nonsensical.
So you're saying that @ajfang 's account is nonsensical?
THAT is not a valid phrase. How can an account on a chess website be nonsensical?
After all, chess is a game that requires logical reasoning.
@Robert_G123456789 said in #25:
> *laughs*
> *laughs*
> *laughs*
> You say that brainrot should be removed because it is nonsense.
> But, what you just posted is nonsense, too!
> Think about it. You just said that it takes "a greed". That is not a valid phrase in any language on Earth and beyond. AND, yes, you just confirmed that I can draw them :))))))))))))))))))))))))).
'It takes a greed' by itself isn't a valid phrase, yes. But 'it just takes a greed for views to do something' etc. etc. could mean that all it takes to come up with an idiotic idea like that is the desire for views, NOT creativity, which is, in my opinion, true.
Also, do you not know what sarcasm is?
> So, if you are going to delete brainrot, why don't you delete all your posts and your account?
> They are comparable in the amount of nonsense that they have, although I'd say that the latter is more nonsensical.
So you're saying that @ajfang 's account is nonsensical?
THAT is not a valid phrase. How can an account on a chess website be nonsensical?
After all, chess is a game that requires logical reasoning.
I dont believe in god anyway
I dont believe in god anyway
@Avyaanagra said in #49:
I dont believe in god anyway
No one can tell you your belief
You know for yourself your mind is for use with you and not to another
You know from within yourself and this belief can't be taken from you
@Avyaanagra said in #49:
> I dont believe in god anyway
No one can tell you your belief
You know for yourself your mind is for use with you and not to another
You know from within yourself and this belief can't be taken from you