@obladie said in #70:
> You do not hold any math qualifications.
I do.
> My other degrees are Chemistry and another low level Physics degree.
I really don't care.
@polylogarithmique said in #72:
> I do.
>
> I really don't care.
You actually do.
@polylogarithmique
Math requires proof and not elementary facts.
Every thing in maths needs to be proved.
Plus, I have always said that proofs of science should not be by experiments as scientists are used to.
'If one thinks of something as correct then they should prove it correct in every field'
Now prove mathematically scientific laws which are only postulated by experiment which actually doesn't make any sense.
Like prove that speed of light is ultimate (there isn't actually) and no excuses alllowed.
Einstein had postulated that speed of light is ultimate but as I have said on previous threads, speed of light isn't ultimate.
@CalbernandHowbe
Finally someone understood what I really meant.
Just like the definition of 'second' was changed over time similarly I want definitions of some terms in fields of maths and science to be changed universally.
I was changing the definition of transcendental numbers slightly and not like that of integers which would literally change whole of Maths.
Nice take by you on my prospect but good that you understood what I was trying to explain other than those guys who simply don't think and directly come to target me.
Let's leave those guys who don't think by themselves and only speak language of Maths.
Thanks for acknowledging!
i dont think you got the point of my post lol
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.