General chat .

In my opinion, it's very much valid.

Your opinion does not jibe with the facts.Don't blame me.

I was talking about logical ways of improving the legal process, so it's independent of what happens in reality. I hope you understand what I mean. @obladie

And please appreciate that you don't have authority to factualise when it comes to this concept.

Does that mean fact is inadmissible?

Facts are admissible. But you can't coat your understanding of something as a fact.

There seems to be a growing expectation amongst the drug companies engaged in such work that there could be a vaccine by late this year.Indications are that the various government bodies who approve such things for general use will be amenable to fast-tracking said approval.
Meanwhile indications are that broadly speaking,a gradual easing of restrictions can work provided there is close monitoring for cluster-outbreaks.
Distancing has been conclusively shown to be the key to limiting spread.

And wearing a mask too I believe?

Yes,as a secondary line of defence. Unavoidable close contact will happen.That's when a mask becomes primary defence.

Mold allergy kicking my butt this week.

In the fall I will have sinus surgery for the first time.

Sideshow Puppeteer pouring now. Thank you Obladie for your recommendation.