- Blind mode tutorial
lichess.org
Donate

Charlie Kirk was shot

According to PBS.

>Kirk was speaking at a debate hosted by his nonprofit political youth organization, Arizona-based Turning Point USA, at the Sorensen Center courtyard on campus. Immediately before the shooting, he was taking questions from an audience member about gun violence.
>
>“Do you know how many transgender Americans have been mass shooters over the last 10 years?” the person asked. Kirk responded, “Too many.”
>
>The questioner followed up: “Do you know how many mass shooters there have been in America over the last 10 years?”
>
>“Counting or not counting gang violence?” Kirk asked.
>
>Then a shot rang out.

His way of debating reminds me of someone else.

A great man ofc.
@Alientcp said in #48:
> If they were getting 50% guns from criminals we would not having this conversation.
but as is some dude with the will to kill and to buy a gun , legally , and then kill. or better yet , someone who wants to make money $$$ can go buy a gun and modify it so it can not be traced back , then sell it to criminal - so currently without a tight regulation there u can get a gun way easier , which in turn means that more ppl with criminal tendendency can get it easier too

> Which one? Which culture? Chinese? Japanese? Black? White? European? Indian?
culture of: these women are human beings not sex objects , u can not buy everything with money and ppl with money r not better then the rest , not smarter , not nicer , in fact they r just rich and should be treated as harshly as anyone else. this is what currently is lacking in usa , with its materialistic american spirit , if u could get a culture that emphasizes on the human not the net worrth i believe it would over time reduce sexual objectification

> The few cases of isolated success arent the norm. They generally cant.
isolated success? man wth?
are u saying that boys who only grow up with a mom (and maybe their grandparents and siblings) will not be full men?
on what basis? sure these boys dont have someone to show how to pee whilst standing but that does not mean they wont become men.
the only thing i can think of that will quell their success is money (lack of money) , but even that is normally circumventeble by getting a job when u r old enough or into the army for few years --> but this is profession success , not success as becoming a man
or do u believe all boys in single mom household never grow up and stay at home until 30 , play ranked with ppl 10 years younger and be incel on twitter? bc i now a few that have 2 parents that fit this description.

> Scared of a crazy feminist who could accuse them of sexual harassment or assault. Now looking in a general direction to where a women is, is dangerous enough.
dude dont believe the incels
feminisim was origianlly just the thought that women could be in same social standing as men , not superioirty or other shit like modern 'karen' , if someone accuses someone of sexual harrassmant without any actual harrassmant taking place this means that they r in the wrong not the person accused. looking at woman direction is not dangerous , but if u r checking someone out a lil too much u could see that being a little off , right?
in fact i guarantee , 99% of ppl that post online about women and being all crybaby like: 'no one wants to go on date , no one allows a dude to take a rest , everywhere i go they beleive me to be pedo' 99% of these r incels who never ever had a real talk with another human being outside of their home , they accuse women for being women whilst they r too scared to go over and ask out her friend. then on first date they just wanna fuck and u know , that is not all what human connection is.this is problem more and more bc young generation watch ppl like andrew tate and think this bevahoiur is normal while it is not

> Its not if they want. They have to do it to a high degree. Those are the ones that have to let pass. You can clearly see whats happening to Europe. The US is in a worse place still. How it is possible that immigrants can burn the US flag and get away with it? To the country that was generous enough to let them live there? Nah.
how possible? freedom of speech much? in country of usa , country for free speeck? (whatever free spech means btw)
no the question is: if u were a country (big , strong country with a big florida) what would u wanna have?
1. immigrants that will assimilate with ur ppl asap - they forget their country of origin and live the american live , just have to ignore them not being white
2. immigrants that will integrate with ur ppl - these dudes will create a local taco bell and actually introduce edible food into usa economics , but also retain their cultural origin to some extent , but will pick up a lot from us culture 2
3. immigrant that will keep to htemselef , no mixing with ur ppl: they be amish ppl of new york , buy ur products work for ur ppl but not in free time
1 and 2 require effort , is there incentive enough if u hear everywhere in news?: illegal immigrants must be deported! these migrants regardless of origin or length of stay will need to go! , and in case 3. u can say: see,they dont want to integrate themselves! evil evil migrants

in europe there is a lot of issues bc of culture clash , and whil it result in some kind of 2. eventually , currently there is a some of ghetto 3. tho i believe this will sort out soon enough
but again where is incentive if u have parties calling for the deprotations? i mean , would u wanna learn korean if u knew , that u could be the one deported from korea in 3 months? would it be worth it to u? or should u not just invest the time u have into a job so u got some $ on u for the eventual deportation?
this is very difficult topic , especially as we r talking abiout livelihood of ppl we never meet as if they were some political puppet
@notsoneutral said in #2:
> en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Kirk
>
> May I suggest you read the section Political positions and activities ?

Do you really hold the view that political assassinations, or any assassinations for that matter, are just and okay as long as they're against people you don't like? I'm sorry, but if you actually think the guy deserved to get shot to death, or shot at all, there is more wrong with you than with him, as much as I disagree with his views and actions.

In what universe is it okay to literally rob someone of their life, not to speak of people who lost a relative or a loved one, just because you disagree with them?
This was an act of needless violence and brutality, which served no purpose other than making the political situation in the US worse than it already was.
@b105g said in #53:
>
i think he was trying to say: oh look why he was there that day he got shot
and to show who charlie was for us uneducated apolitical people
but im not him , im me , so i cant really know for sure
@b105g said in #53:
> Do you really hold the view that political assassinations, or any assassinations for that matter, are just and okay as long as they're against people you don't like? I'm sorry, but if you actually think the guy deserved to get shot to death, or shot at all, there is more wrong with you than with him, as much as I disagree with his views and actions.

No not at all.

I do think that if we have faith we'll have a Reality Check after our death.

If you do not bring your faith public and try to impose your beliefs on others you won't be bothered.

For example if life is precious and you're pretending to be pro life if the the person is transgender or working in a health clinic doing abortion the life of that person should be saved at all cost.
@notsoneutral said in #55:
> No not at all.
>
> I do think that if we have faith we'll have a Reality Check after our death.
>
> If you do not bring your faith public and try to impose your beliefs on others you won't be bothered.
>
> For example if life is precious and you're pretending to be pro life if the the person is transgender or working n a health clinic doing abortion the life should be saved at all cost.

I assume you were specifically referring to the section on christian nationalism then?
@AsDaGo said in #28:
> The irony is that your post has 6 grammar errors and 1 spelling error (not counting words like "yo," "ur," "btw," and "u").
>
> Grammar errors:
> 1. First sentence isn't capitalized.
> 2. No comma after "yo."
> 3. No comma after "hmm."
> 4. No apostrophe in "isnt." (I suppose you could say this is a spelling error.)
> 5. The ellipsis in the second sentence should also have a period since it ends the sentence.
> 6. No period in the final sentence.
>
> And the spelling error is of course "grammer."
>
> I do agree that @notsoneutral's post is very cryptic, but the confusion is semantic, not syntactic.
@AsDaGo im still a kid, im Dyslexic, I have ADHD, and im mildly autistic. im trying my best here. He's a fully grown adult, and should at least make his sentences sound clearer.
@notsoneutral said in #57:
>
You're gonna need to be more specific, he did a ton of awful shit. That doesn't justify brutally assassinating him.