Try using PEDMAS/BODMAS
Answer is 67.
Why did you delete your message, @Ar4Asd1_Chess?
@Ar4Asd1_Chess said in #11:
> Try using PEDMAS/BODMAS
>
> Answer is 67.
It's very close to 67, but not exactly. See #9 for the exact answer.
@AsDaGo said in #13:
> It's very close to 67, but not exactly. See #9 for the exact answer.
Well, I checked using AI too! And using MY Brain. it is correct.
@Ar4Asd1_Chess said in #14:
> Well, I checked using AI too! And using MY Brain. it is correct.
I didn't use AI, and I'm not surprised it's wrong (actually I am surprised it got as close as it did). Once again, it's very close to 67, but not exactly. It is approximately 67.0000000000000001, but see #9 for the exact answer.
@AsDaGo said in #15:
> I didn't use AI, and I'm not surprised it's wrong (actually I am surprised it got as close as it did). Once again, it's very close to 67, but not exactly. It is approximately 67.0000000000000001, but see #9 for the exact answer.
Bruh, fine.
Thx for saving us @AsDaGo
@AsDaGo said in #13:
> It's very close to 67, but not exactly. See #9 for the exact answer.
Well, according to my calculations, close would be 1,2, or maybe 5 off. But, the answer 76100000... is a bit too great to be called close to 67, isn't it? :P
@chesspanda6 said in #18:
> Well, according to my calculations, close would be 1,2, or maybe 5 off. But, the answer 76100000... is a bit too great to be called close to 67, isn't it? :P
I think you did the calculation wrong.
@AsDaGo said in #19:
> I think you did the calculation wrong.
15512081662300000022691067351/231523606900000000000000000 - 67 = 9 no?
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.