No, @Telecaster12 , although I see why you'd ask that and find it reassuring that you (unlike too many) know what a "Baker's Dozen" is.
But here's the thing: I didn't write "Half of a Baker's dozen" (which would, indeed, be 6.5).
I wrote a Baker's Half-dozen. Which, in order to stick with an integral number of discrete objects, I declare to be 7.
That is, half of a dozen -- plus 1.
Just as a Baker's dozen is a dozen -- plus 1.
Since I believe I coined the term, I believe I am entitled to define it.
And so I did. See #38.
Incidentally, it appears that the original "Baker's Dozen" came to be as a result of steady, rational English bakers reacting to English law.
My Baker's Half-dozen came about as the result of an English beverage. Let's assume, out of politeness, that it's tea.
No, @Telecaster12 , although I see why you'd ask that and find it reassuring that you (unlike too many) know what a "Baker's Dozen" is.
But here's the thing: I didn't write "Half of a Baker's dozen" (which would, indeed, be 6.5).
I wrote a Baker's Half-dozen. Which, in order to stick with an integral number of discrete objects, I declare to be 7.
That is, half of a dozen -- plus 1.
Just as a Baker's dozen is a dozen -- plus 1.
Since I believe I coined the term, I believe I am entitled to define it.
And so I did. See #38.
Incidentally, it appears that the original "Baker's Dozen" came to be as a result of steady, rational English bakers reacting to English law.
My Baker's Half-dozen came about as the result of an English beverage. Let's assume, out of politeness, that it's tea.