@Vxp2023 said in #10:
Sorry, but what do you meaning? I did not understand you completely. You want me not to answer your posts?
I want you to create your own topic for your own issues instead of talking about your issues in a completely unrelated topic.
@Vxp2023 said in #10:
> Sorry, but what do you meaning? I did not understand you completely. You want me not to answer your posts?
I want you to create your own topic for your own issues instead of talking about your issues in a completely unrelated topic.
Sorry, I thought it is. I'll stay away from this topic. Goodbuy.
Sorry, I thought it is. I'll stay away from this topic. Goodbuy.
Firstly, no it's not.
Secondly, I don't think it would be good if it worked that way.
Let alone that the use of this procedure isn't clear to me.
Firstly, no it's not.
Secondly, I don't think it would be good if it worked that way.
Let alone that the use of this procedure isn't clear to me.
@InkyDarkBird said in #8:
Second of all, you were the one making the claim the LICHESS cheating algorithm consumes a ton of data, which you still have provided no evidence for. It is the burden of the affirmative to prove the affirmative, otherwise presumption negates.
First of all you must not believe in anything, but that does not give you the right to produce outright false information.
Isn't this a thing that should be obvious, even to kids?
Next, i did not claim that the Lichess fraud detection algorithm uses lots of data, i did claim that machine learning in general does. It is indeed possible to construct a fraud detection system without any resort to any cheater data at all, and yours truly had constructed one, albeit not very successful. Nevertheless modern system uses typically lots of data.
In addition, I do not understand how your argument of data consumption would apply to removing games from the game database.
I do not get this nonsense and i am sick of it. By now it is obvious that are so called "troll" and nothing else.
@InkyDarkBird said in #8:
> Second of all, you were the one making the claim the LICHESS cheating algorithm consumes a ton of data, which you still have provided no evidence for. It is the burden of the affirmative to prove the affirmative, otherwise presumption negates.
First of all you must not believe in anything, but that does not give you the right to produce outright false information.
Isn't this a thing that should be obvious, even to kids?
Next, i did not claim that the Lichess fraud detection algorithm uses lots of data, i did claim that machine learning in general does. It is indeed possible to construct a fraud detection system without any resort to any cheater data at all, and yours truly had constructed one, albeit not very successful. Nevertheless modern system uses typically lots of data.
> In addition, I do not understand how your argument of data consumption would apply to removing games from the game database.
I do not get this nonsense and i am sick of it. By now it is obvious that are so called "troll" and nothing else.
@fiskaren said in #14:
First of all you must not believe in anything, but that does not give you the right to produce outright false information.
I have not stated any misinformation.
Next, i did not claim that the Lichess fraud detection algorithm uses lots of data, i did claim that machine learning in general does.
So, then your entire argument fails since your post is not even about the Lichess cheating algorithm.
I do not get this nonsense and i am sick of it. By now it is obvious that are so called "troll" and nothing else.
Where have I trolled? I am simply giving my honest opinion.
@fiskaren said in #14:
> First of all you must not believe in anything, but that does not give you the right to produce outright false information.
I have not stated any misinformation.
> Next, i did not claim that the Lichess fraud detection algorithm uses lots of data, i did claim that machine learning in general does.
So, then your entire argument fails since your post is not even about the Lichess cheating algorithm.
> I do not get this nonsense and i am sick of it. By now it is obvious that are so called "troll" and nothing else.
Where have I trolled? I am simply giving my honest opinion.
This must be the weirdest development of a thread I've ever seen on a lichess forum.
My suggestion was very simple; removing games played by cheaters from the opening database. Not asking to have the games removed from lichess, just from the database.
I also know that this is not currently possible to do from the users end, so I am presenting this as a feature request.
This must be the weirdest development of a thread I've ever seen on a lichess forum.
My suggestion was very simple; removing games played by cheaters from the opening database. Not asking to have the games removed from lichess, just from the database.
I also know that this is not currently possible to do from the users end, so I am presenting this as a feature request.